
AI Analysis of Health Records May Help Identify ADHD Risk Years Earlier
Key Takeaways:
- Artificial intelligence can analyse routine electronic health records to estimate a child’s risk of developing ADHD years before diagnosis.
- The model demonstrated strong accuracy across diverse populations, using data from more than 140,000 children.
- The tool is designed to support earlier evaluation and intervention, not to replace clinical diagnosis.
AI and the challenge of delayed ADHD diagnosis
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects millions of children worldwide. Despite its prevalence, many children experience significant delays before receiving a formal diagnosis. This can limit access to timely support, even when early signs are present.
New research from Duke Health suggests that artificial intelligence may help address this gap. By analysing routinely collected electronic health records, researchers have developed a tool capable of identifying patterns that indicate a higher likelihood of future ADHD diagnosis, potentially years in advance.
Unlocking insights from routine healthcare data
The study, published in Nature Mental Health on April 27, demonstrates how existing healthcare data can be used to support earlier clinical decision-making.
“We have this incredibly rich source of information sitting in electronic health records,” said Elliot Hill, lead author of the study and data scientist in the Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics at Duke University School of Medicine. “The idea was to see whether patterns hidden in that data could help us predict which children might later be diagnosed with ADHD, well before that diagnosis usually happens.”
Rather than relying on new or specialised testing, the approach draws on information already collected during standard healthcare visits. This includes developmental milestones, behavioural observations, and clinical events recorded from birth through early childhood.
How the AI model was developed
To build and test the model, researchers analysed electronic health records from more than 140,000 children, including both those diagnosed with ADHD and those without the condition.
The AI system was trained to identify combinations of factors that tend to appear before an ADHD diagnosis is made. Over time, it learned to detect subtle patterns across large datasets that may not be easily recognised through conventional clinical assessment alone.
The model showed strong performance in estimating ADHD risk in children aged 5 years and older. Notably, its accuracy remained consistent across different population groups, including variations in sex, race, ethnicity, and insurance status.
A support tool, not a diagnostic replacement
The researchers emphasise that the AI system is not intended to diagnose ADHD. Instead, it serves as a clinical support tool that can help identify children who may benefit from closer monitoring or earlier referral for specialist assessment.
“This is not an AI doctor,” said Matthew Engelhard, M.D., Ph.D., in Duke’s Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, and senior author of the study. “It’s a tool to help clinicians focus their time and resources, so kids who need help don’t fall through the cracks or wait years for answers.”
By highlighting children who may be at higher risk, the tool could enable healthcare professionals to prioritise evaluation and initiate discussions with families sooner.
Potential benefits of earlier identification
Earlier identification of children at risk of ADHD could have meaningful implications for long-term outcomes. Research consistently shows that timely diagnosis and intervention are associated with improved academic performance, social development, and overall health.
“Children with ADHD can really struggle when their needs aren’t understood and adequate supports are not in place,” said study author Naomi Davis, Ph.D., associate professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. “Connecting families with timely, evidence-based interventions is essential for helping them achieve their goals and laying a foundation for future success.”
The ability to flag potential concerns earlier may also help reduce the delays that many families face when seeking answers and support.
Next steps and ongoing research
While the findings are promising, the researchers stress that further validation is needed before such tools are implemented in routine clinical practice. Additional studies will be required to confirm effectiveness, assess real-world impact, and ensure safe integration into healthcare systems.
Hill and Engelhard have also explored the broader use of AI models in identifying risks and contributing factors for mental health conditions in adolescents, signalling a growing interest in predictive tools within this field.
Study authors and funding
In addition to Elliot Hill, Matthew Engelhard, and Naomi Davis, the study authors include De Rong Loh, Benjamin A. Goldstein, and Geraldine Dawson.
The research was supported by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health (K01-MH127309, UL1 TR002553) and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences.
Source: EurekAlert!




