WHO Issues First Global Guideline on GLP-1 Therapies for Treating Obesity
Key Takeaways:
- WHO has released its first global guideline on the use of GLP-1 therapies for treating obesity as a chronic, relapsing disease, offering conditional recommendations for adults.
- While the medicines show meaningful benefits, WHO stresses that medication alone will not reverse the obesity crisis and that person-centred, lifelong care is essential.
- Concerns remain about long-term safety data, affordability, availability, and the potential for widening global health disparities without deliberate policy action.
Introduction: A new milestone in global obesity care
The World Health Organization (WHO) has issued its first global guideline on the use of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) therapies for treating obesity, a chronic and relapsing disease affecting more than one billion people worldwide. Obesity contributes to 3.7 million deaths globally each year, and without urgent action the number of people living with obesity is projected to double by 2030.
The new guideline follows the decision made in September 2025 to add GLP-1 therapies to the WHO Essential Medicines List for managing type 2 diabetes in individuals at high risk. With this new document, WHO provides its first formal, conditional recommendations on the use of GLP-1 therapies specifically for obesity as part of a comprehensive treatment approach that includes healthy diets, regular physical activity, and professional health support.
“Obesity is a major global health challenge that WHO is committed to addressing by supporting countries and people worldwide to control it, effectively and equitably. Our new guidance recognises that obesity is a chronic disease that can be treated with comprehensive and lifelong care,” said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General. “While medication alone won’t solve this global health crisis, GLP-1 therapies can help millions overcome obesity and reduce its associated harms.”
The global and economic burden of obesity
Obesity is a complex, chronic disease and a major driver of noncommunicable conditions including cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, and some cancers. It also worsens outcomes for people who develop infectious diseases.
The global economic burden is profound. The worldwide cost of obesity is projected to reach US$ 3 trillion every year by 2030 due to increased healthcare demands and the rising costs of managing obesity-related complications. WHO hopes that clear guidance on the use of GLP-1 therapies will support efforts to reduce escalating healthcare expenditure while improving outcomes for people affected by obesity.
A landmark policy shift: WHO’s conditional recommendations
WHO’s new guideline sets out two key conditional recommendations based on currently available evidence.
1. Use of GLP-1 therapies in adults living with obesity
WHO states that GLP-1 therapies may be considered for long-term treatment in adults, excluding pregnant women. The medicines have demonstrated clear efficacy in supporting weight loss and improving metabolic outcomes. However, the recommendation remains conditional due to several concerns:
- Limited long-term data on safety, durability, maintenance, and outcomes following discontinuation
- High costs of treatment
- Insufficient readiness of health systems to support widespread use
- Possible negative effects on health equity
2. Combining GLP-1 therapies with intensive behavioural interventions
WHO also recommends that adults living with obesity and prescribed GLP-1 therapies may be offered structured behavioural interventions, including support for dietary changes and increased physical activity. This recommendation reflects low-certainty evidence suggesting that combining medication with lifestyle interventions may yield better outcomes.
Medication alone will not reverse the obesity crisis
Although GLP-1 therapies represent the first highly effective pharmacological treatment for adults living with obesity, WHO emphasises that medication on its own is insufficient. Obesity must be addressed as both an individual and societal challenge. The guideline calls for a fundamental shift toward comprehensive strategies built on three pillars:
- Creating healthier environments through population-level policies that promote health and prevent obesity.
- Protecting people at high risk by using targeted screening and structured early interventions.
- Ensuring person-centred, lifelong care for people living with obesity, recognising the chronic nature of the disease.
Implementing the guideline: Equity, system readiness and global access
WHO notes that fair access to GLP-1 therapies must be prioritised. Without deliberate policies, these medicines could deepen existing global health inequalities. System readiness, affordability, and supply capacity are major concerns.
Even with rapid increases in manufacturing, GLP-1 therapies are expected to reach fewer than 10 percent of people who could benefit from them by 2030. WHO urges global leaders to consider approaches that expand access, such as:
- Tiered pricing
- Pooled procurement mechanisms
- Voluntary licensing arrangements
These measures could help prevent widening disparities as demand expands.
Development of the guideline
The guideline was developed in direct response to requests from WHO Member States seeking actionable direction on obesity care. The process involved:
- Extensive assessment of available scientific evidence
- Input from global stakeholders
- Engagement with people who have lived experience of obesity
This document forms a core component of the WHO acceleration plan to stop obesity and will be updated regularly as new evidence emerges.
During 2026, WHO intends to work with partners to create a transparent and equitable prioritisation framework to ensure that individuals with the greatest medical need receive treatment first.
Notes to editors
About GLP-1 therapies for obesity
WHO defines obesity in adults as having a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or above. GLP-1 receptor agonists help lower blood glucose, support weight loss, reduce cardiovascular and renal risks, and can reduce early mortality in people with type 2 diabetes.
This guideline provides recommendations for three GLP-1 agents used in the long-term treatment of obesity in adults:
- Liraglutide
- Semaglutide
- Tirzepatide
Falsified and substandard products
The surge in global demand has contributed to the spread of falsified and substandard GLP-1 products. WHO stresses that safe access requires:
- Prescription and distribution through regulated, qualified healthcare providers
- Strong oversight and monitoring
- Patient education
- International cooperation to safeguard public health
The organisation warns that falsified or substandard medicines threaten both patient safety and public trust.
CCH insight:
This new guideline is very welcome. The World Health Organisation has been a little slow in recognising obesity as a chronic relapsing disease and the importance of GLP-1 medications as a very important development in obesity treatment. However, these guidelines are comprehensive, consistent with treatment of obesity as a chronic relapsing disease, and recognise the challenges of delivering safe, sustainable, equitable obesity care.
Read More
Novo Nordisk’s Amycretin Emerges as a Strong Next-Generation Obesity and Diabetes Candidate in Early and Mid-Stage Trials
Key Takeaways:
- Early and mid-stage studies indicate that amycretin delivers substantial, dose-dependent weight loss in people who are overweight or have obesity, as well as in people with type 2 diabetes.
- Safety findings remain broadly consistent with GLP-1-based agents, with mainly mild to moderate gastrointestinal effects and no weight-loss plateau observed within study periods.
- Novo Nordisk’s new data signal a potentially important successor to semaglutide, strengthening the company’s obesity and diabetes pipeline as it faces patent expirations and competitive pressure from Eli Lilly.
Introduction
A new body of evidence published in The Lancet and released by Novo Nordisk suggests that amycretin, an investigational once-weekly therapy targeting multiple metabolic pathways, may offer clinically meaningful weight reduction and glycaemic improvements in adults who are overweight or have obesity, as well as in adults with type 2 diabetes. The findings come as Novo Nordisk aims to consolidate its leadership in the weight-loss market following concerns about semaglutide’s recent performance in Alzheimer’s trials and increasing competition from Eli Lilly.
Amycretin combines actions on the glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), amylin, and calcitonin receptors. This multi-pathway design is intended to amplify appetite suppression, slow gastric emptying, and improve metabolic control. Amylin’s role is particularly relevant because it complements GLP-1 signalling, and combining these effects may provide more durable weight management than existing single-pathway therapies.
Background
Obesity affects more than one billion people worldwide and increases the risk of conditions such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and sleep apnoea. Although GLP-1 or GIP receptor agonists have transformed obesity care, many individuals still struggle to meet health goals or encounter diminishing returns over time. Enhancing these therapies with additional hormonal pathways, such as amylin, has been of growing scientific interest.
Amylin, a pancreatic hormone, naturally suppresses appetite, slows digestive transit, and moderates post-meal glucose spikes. When combined with GLP-1 activation, amylin may strengthen satiety signals and support deeper and more sustained weight reduction. Amycretin, a single peptide simultaneously targeting GLP-1, amylin, and calcitonin receptors, represents an effort to leverage these combined mechanisms.
While animal studies have shown potent metabolic effects, the safety, tolerability, and human efficacy of this multi-pathway approach had not been fully established, prompting the recently reported Phase 1b/2a trial and Novo Nordisk’s parallel mid-stage diabetes study.
Phase 1b/2a trial overview (adults who are overweight or have obesity)
Study design
Investigators conducted a five-part, randomised, placebo-controlled Phase 1b/2a trial at a single clinical site in San Antonio, Texas. Eligible adults were aged 18–55 years, had a baseline BMI between 27.0 and 39.9 kg/m², and had no major illnesses such as diabetes. Participants received subcutaneous amycretin or placebo once weekly.
The trial included:
- Part A: Single ascending doses (0.3 mg, 0.6 mg, 1.0 mg).
- Part B: Dose escalation to 60 mg over 36 weeks.
- Part C: Dose escalation to a 20 mg maintenance dose for the final 12 weeks of a 36-week period.
- Part D: Dose escalation to a 5 mg maintenance dose for the final 12 weeks of 28 weeks.
- Part E: Dose escalation to a 1.25 mg maintenance dose for the final 12 weeks of 20 weeks.
Endpoints and monitoring
The primary endpoint was the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. Secondary endpoints included:
- Percentage change in body weight
- Pharmacokinetic parameters
- Exploratory metabolic biomarkers (fasting glucose and HbA1c)
Participants had regular laboratory testing, ECG monitoring, and safety assessments. Analyses were adjusted for baseline weight and missing data.
Phase 1b/2a results
Participant characteristics
Between September 2023 and April 2024, the study enrolled 125 adults. A total of 101 received amycretin and 24 received placebo. Baseline BMIs ranged from 30.0 to 33.1 kg/m² across treatment groups, with an overall mean of 33.4 kg/m². Baseline weights ranged from 83.6 kg to 99.1 kg.
Tolerability and discontinuations
Thirty-eight participants receiving amycretin (37%) and four receiving placebo (17%) discontinued the study. Most discontinuations were not related to safety, and investigators noted that placebo discontinuations appeared consistent with a likely nocebo effect.
Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 92% of amycretin recipients and 100% of placebo recipients in Parts B–E. Gastrointestinal effects were most common and included:
- Nausea: 82%
- Vomiting: 53%
- Diarrhoea: 41%
These symptoms generally peaked during dose escalation and diminished afterwards. Dysaesthesia rates varied by cohort, ranging from 6% to 29%, and resolved in all but one participant.
One case of mild gallstone pancreatitis occurred during dose escalation in Part C (2.5 mg), later progressing to a serious recurrent episode that ultimately resolved.
No clinically meaningful ECG abnormalities were detected. A transient early rise in heart rate of about 10 bpm resolved without intervention. Antidrug antibodies appeared in 29% of Part B participants and 21% in Part C.
Weight-loss effects
Weight reduction was rapid, dose-dependent, and sustained. Mean percentage weight losses at end of treatment were:
- 60 mg (week 36): 24.3%
- 20 mg (week 36): 22.0%
- 5 mg (week 28): 16.2%
- 1.25 mg (week 20): 9.7%
Placebo groups had much smaller changes: −1.1% (Part B), +1.9% (Part C), +2.3% (Part D), and +2.0% (Part E).
Superiority to placebo emerged by week 4 and continued to widen without evidence of plateau during the maintenance phases. Repeated-measures models produced nearly identical weight-loss estimates.
Metabolic effects
Exploratory findings indicated modest improvements:
- Fasting glucose reductions up to 0.8 mmol/L
- HbA1c reductions of 0.6 percentage points in the highest-dose cohort
Lipid levels and seated blood pressure remained neutral.
Novo Nordisk’s mid-stage trial in type 2 diabetes
In parallel with the early-stage obesity trial, Novo Nordisk announced promising results from a mid-stage study evaluating amycretin in adults with type 2 diabetes who had inadequate glycaemic control with metformin, with or without an SGLT2 inhibitor. The trial included 448 participants and assessed both once-weekly subcutaneous and oral formulations.
Context and competitive landscape
The announcement came one day after Novo Nordisk reported disappointing Alzheimer’s trial results for semaglutide. With patent expirations approaching and rising competition from Eli Lilly’s amylin-based agent eloralintide, analysts are closely watching amycretin’s performance.
Amycretin is widely viewed as a potential “best-in-class” therapeutic candidate. It follows CagriSema, a combination approach which had raised strong expectations but ultimately delivered less weight loss than anticipated in prior studies.
Key findings
- Weight loss:
- Up to 14.5% weight reduction with once-weekly injections over 36 weeks
- Up to 10.1% weight reduction with the oral formulation
- Both routes showed no weight-loss plateau, suggesting the potential for further reduction with longer treatment durations.
- Up to 14.5% weight reduction with once-weekly injections over 36 weeks
- Glycaemic control:
- Statistically significant HbA1c reductions
- Up to 89.1% of participants achieved HbA1c below 7%
- Side-effects were mostly mild gastrointestinal symptoms.
- Statistically significant HbA1c reductions
Novo Nordisk stated it intends to begin late-stage clinical trials in 2026.
Analyst commentary
BMO Capital analyst Evan Seigerman noted that the data represent progress for Novo Nordisk:
“The data, though not enough to completely change the narrative for Novo, marks a step in the right direction for the company.”
Kepler Cheuvreux analyst David Evans commented on amycretin’s broader potential:
“The level of weight-loss seen bodes well not only for its potential in diabetes but also in obesity.”
Morningstar analyst Karen Andersen projected substantial commercial potential, estimating peak annual sales of $8 billion by 2034, split approximately evenly between diabetes and obesity indications, assuming a 2029 launch.
Conclusion
The combined early- and mid-stage data suggest that amycretin may represent a significant development in obesity and diabetes treatment. Its multi-pathway design has shown robust weight-loss effects across populations and the possibility of improved metabolic outcomes. While long-term safety and efficacy need confirmation in Phase 3 trials, amycretin appears positioned as one of Novo Nordisk’s most important next-generation candidates at a time of high strategic importance for the company.
Read More
Metformin May Help Prevent Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation After Ablation in Adults with Obesity
Key Takeaways:
- Adults with obesity who took metformin after AFib ablation had fewer recurrences of atrial fibrillation compared with those receiving standard care alone.
- 78% of participants receiving metformin remained free of AFib episodes lasting 30 seconds or more, compared with 58% in the standard care group.
- Researchers suggest further large-scale studies are needed to confirm whether diabetes medications such as metformin or GLP-1 receptor agonists could support heart rhythm stability in people with obesity who do not have diabetes.
Metformin shows promise beyond diabetes treatment
People with atrial fibrillation (AFib) and obesity may experience fewer episodes of irregular heart rhythm after undergoing ablation if they take the diabetes medication metformin in addition to standard care, according to a preliminary presentation of late-breaking science at the American Heart Association’s (AHA) Scientific Sessions 2025, held from 7 to 10 November in New Orleans. The annual meeting is a leading international forum for sharing new research and clinical advances in cardiovascular medicine.
“Lifestyle and risk factor modification efforts are essential to treating AFib and, according to the results of our study, could be aided by taking metformin,” said Dr Amish Deshmukh, lead author and clinical assistant professor of medicine at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor.
AFib, characterised by an irregular and often rapid heartbeat, is the most common form of heart rhythm disorder. According to the AHA, it can lead to blood clots, stroke, heart failure, or other cardiovascular complications.
Metformin, a long-established and low-cost generic medication, helps regulate blood glucose levels and is most often prescribed to people with Type 2 diabetes. It is widely regarded as a first-line treatment due to its safety, affordability, and efficacy.
Exploring metformin’s role in reducing AFib recurrence
Previous research has indicated that people with diabetes and obesity who take metformin tend to have a lower risk of developing AFib compared with those using other antidiabetic medications. In laboratory studies, metformin has shown direct effects on cardiac cells, including the reduction of abnormal heart rhythms. Building on this evidence, researchers sought to determine whether metformin could help reduce the recurrence of AFib in people with obesity or overweight following catheter ablation.
The Metformin as an Adjunctive Therapy to Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation (META-AF) study enrolled 99 adults with AFib who were either overweight or obese. All participants underwent catheter ablation – a procedure that targets and removes small areas of heart tissue responsible for irregular electrical activity – and were then randomly assigned to receive either standard care alone or standard care plus metformin.
Standard care included lifestyle education focused on physical activity, nutrition, sleep, and management of comorbidities. Participants in the metformin group received the medication in addition to these measures.
Key findings: Fewer AFib episodes with metformin
Over the 12 months following ablation, the analysis revealed:
- 78% of those taking metformin experienced no AFib episodes lasting 30 seconds or longer, compared with 58% of those receiving usual care.
- 6% of participants in the metformin group required a repeat ablation or electric cardioversion (a procedure to restore normal rhythm) versus 16% in the usual care group.
- 8% of participants in the metformin group had recurrent AFib during rhythm monitoring, compared with 16% in the usual care group.
- Antiarrhythmic medication was required by 8% of participants in the metformin group versus 18% in usual care.
- Weight changes were minimal across both groups, consistent with previous findings that metformin produces little or no weight reduction in people without diabetes.
“Treatment with metformin in people with obesity who do not have diabetes and are undergoing AFib ablation seems to lower the likelihood of recurrent AFib or atrial arrhythmias after a single procedure,” Dr Deshmukh said. “While most people tolerated the medication well, a significant number stopped taking it due to side effects or because they felt well and did not want to add another medication to their regimen.”
Could other diabetes medications offer similar benefits?
The findings raise further questions about whether other diabetes or weight management drugs – particularly GLP-1 receptor agonists – may also help prevent AFib recurrence in people with obesity who do not have diabetes.
Obesity is a well-established risk factor for AFib. People living with obesity often experience more frequent or recurrent episodes of the condition following catheter ablation. According to the American Heart Association’s 2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics, more than six million people in the United States currently live with AFib.
“I would suggest conducting a larger study to investigate metformin and other diabetes treatments,” Dr Deshmukh added. “We know that many of these medications offer cardiovascular benefits, and we are starting to gain a better understanding of how they might specifically benefit patients with arrhythmias. A study comparing various medications would be valuable to confirm our findings and also to address questions about tolerability, the feasibility of long-term use, and costs.”
Study design and limitations
The META-AF study was conducted at the University of Michigan between 2021 and 2025. It involved 99 adults with an average age of 63 years; 70% were men, and most were white. Among participants, 70% were classified as obese and the remainder as overweight. About 22% had previously undergone ablation, and 46% experienced AFib that stopped spontaneously within a week.
Participants with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes were excluded, although 40% met criteria for prediabetes (HbA1c between 5.7% and 6.4%). Individuals taking diabetes medications or those for whom metformin posed risks were also excluded.
All participants received anticoagulant therapy to reduce the risk of stroke. The ablation targeted pulmonary vein tissue, a common source of AFib triggers.
The study was open-label, meaning participants knew which treatment they were receiving. Forty-nine participants were assigned to the metformin group and fifty to standard care. After a three-month healing period post-ablation, and once the metformin dose was gradually increased to its maximum, participants were monitored for recurrent AFib lasting at least 30 seconds. Researchers measured the AFib burden – the proportion of time spent in AFib – at three months and twelve months using clinical monitoring data, handheld devices, pacemakers, and defibrillators.
A notable limitation was participant withdrawal: 12 of the 49 people assigned to metformin discontinued treatment due to side effects or because they felt improved and preferred to stop the medication. The small sample size and single-centre design also limit generalisability to other populations or ablation techniques.
Disclosures and context
The study’s co-authors, funding, and disclosures are listed in the abstract presented at the AHA meeting.
The AHA emphasises that statements and conclusions from conference presentations reflect only the authors’ views and do not necessarily represent official policy or position. Abstracts presented at the Association’s scientific sessions are reviewed for scientific merit but are not peer-reviewed publications. Therefore, these findings are considered preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.
The Association notes that over 85% of its funding derives from non-corporate sources, including individual donations, foundations, estates, investments, and educational material sales. Corporate donations are accepted under strict policies that prevent any influence on scientific content or policy positions.
Read More
Novo Nordisk’s Oral Semaglutide Shows Cardiovascular Benefits Comparable to Wegovy Injection
Key Takeaways:
- Novo Nordisk’s new oral semaglutide 25 mg pill improved blood glucose control and reduced cardiovascular risk factors, matching the effects of its injectable counterpart, Wegovy.
- Data from the OASIS 4 trial showed significant weight loss and normalisation of blood glucose in people with prediabetes.
- The company expects U.S. regulatory approval for the first oral GLP-1 treatment for weight management by the end of 2025.
Oral GLP-1 pill shows comparable benefits to injection
Novo Nordisk has presented new findings suggesting that its experimental oral obesity medication delivers cardiovascular and metabolic benefits similar to those achieved with its blockbuster injectable, Wegovy. The results were shared at the ObesityWeek 2025 conference in Atlanta and strengthen the Danish company’s case for approval of the pill in the United States later this year.
The oral semaglutide 25 mg tablet, part of the company’s glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) portfolio, was shown to improve blood sugar regulation and reduce cardiovascular risk factors. These results could mark a milestone in obesity care, as the pill would become the first oral GLP-1 therapy approved for weight management.
OASIS 4 trial results
The data come from the OASIS 4 clinical trial, which compared oral semaglutide 25 mg with placebo in adults with overweight or obesity. After 64 weeks, 71.1% of participants with prediabetes who received the treatment achieved normal blood glucose levels, compared with 33.3% in the placebo group.
Participants who lost at least 15% of their body weight experienced additional health benefits, including reductions in blood pressure, inflammatory markers, and triglycerides. Overall, the trial demonstrated both significant weight loss and improvements in cardiometabolic health outcomes.
The primary OASIS 4 results, published in September in the New England Journal of Medicine, reported an average weight loss of 16.6% among participants taking the oral semaglutide.
Comparable outcomes with Wegovy injection
An indirect comparison between OASIS 4 and Novo Nordisk’s earlier STEP 1 trial, which evaluated injectable semaglutide (Wegovy), found the two formulations delivered comparable outcomes in weight reduction and improvements across key cardiometabolic markers.
These findings suggest that people who prefer not to use injectables could soon have an equally effective oral alternative. As demand for obesity pharmacotherapy continues to rise, an oral formulation may further expand access and adherence to GLP-1 treatments.
Regulatory outlook and market plans
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) accepted Novo Nordisk’s application for oral Wegovy in May and is expected to deliver a decision by the end of the fourth quarter of 2025. The company has stated that, if approved, it intends to launch the product shortly thereafter.
Despite a recent dip in share price and slower sales growth, Novo Nordisk’s prospects have been buoyed by positive trial outcomes and an improved pricing arrangement under Medicare. The company is also undergoing leadership changes, including a new Chief Executive Officer and a restructured board, amid efforts to stabilise growth.
Novo Nordisk has indicated that, once approved, the pill will be made available through telehealth platforms such as Ro and WeightWatchers, with a potential subscription model offering discounted pricing. Additionally, Hims & Hers Health recently confirmed it is in discussions with Novo to provide both injectable and oral forms of Wegovy through its digital platform.
A step forward in accessible obesity care
If approved, Novo Nordisk’s oral semaglutide could redefine accessibility and adherence in obesity care. The convenience of a pill that matches the efficacy of an injectable treatment offers a compelling new option for people managing obesity and related cardiometabolic risks.
By broadening the range of treatment modalities within the GLP-1 class, Novo Nordisk continues to shape the evolving landscape of obesity pharmacotherapy — a field that is rapidly transforming the management of metabolic health worldwide.
CCH insights
This news about oral semaglutide is very welcome, but shouldn’t come as a surprise. Oral semaglutide is the exact same compound as injectable semaglutide, and as long as the dose administered orally is sufficient to deliver a similar blood concentration as the injectable form, then the effects should be very similar. It’s the same drug, just a cheaper and easier, but less efficient, route of administration.
Read More
Thousands in Scotland’s Poorest Areas to Receive Free Weight-Loss Jabs in Landmark Obesity Study
Key Takeaways:
- Up to 5,000 adults living with obesity in Scotland’s most deprived areas will receive free weight-loss injections through the new Scotland CardioMetabolic Impact Study (SCoMIS).
- The multi-million-pound research, led by the University of Glasgow, aims to test the real-world delivery and impact of incretin-based therapies in NHS care.
- The study seeks to reduce health inequalities, improve quality of life, and lessen the long-term burden of obesity on individuals and the NHS.
Landmark initiative targets obesity in Scotland’s most deprived communities
Thousands of people from some of Scotland’s most economically deprived areas will soon be offered free weight-loss injections as part of a major UK government-funded study. The initiative, known as the Scotland CardioMetabolic Impact Study (SCoMIS), will recruit between 3,000 and 5,000 participants living with obesity to test how new weight-loss medicines can be delivered effectively and fairly in everyday NHS care.
The research is being led by the University of Glasgow and is backed by an initial £650,000 in funding from the UK government. If successful, it could pave the way for a wider rollout of the medicines across the country, offering a model for addressing both obesity and health inequality.
How the jabs work
The injections mimic or enhance the effects of naturally occurring hormones called incretins, which help control blood sugar levels. These hormones act on areas of the brain that regulate hunger and appetite and can also slow down how quickly the stomach empties. Together, these effects may support people living with obesity to better manage their eating habits and achieve sustained weight loss.
A national effort to reduce health inequality
Dr Zubir Ahmed, UK Health Innovation Minister, said:
“As a practising NHS surgeon and Glasgow MP, I know firsthand the impact of the obesity crisis that plagues Scotland – and the litany of health problems it leads to. More than 1 in 3 adults in Scotland’s most deprived areas are living with obesity. The UK government is committed to tackling inequality wherever it finds it in our country. It’s why this landmark UK government investment is targeting help where it’s needed most in Scotland and meeting people where they are and backing helping the NHS services they trust to treat them.”
Obesity is one of the leading contributors to long-term illness, including heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and several cancers. By addressing obesity through targeted intervention, the UK government hopes to help millions live longer, healthier lives while reducing the strain on the NHS and saving billions in healthcare costs each year.
Study objectives
The SCoMIS trial will evaluate several key areas of impact:
- Delivery: How weight-loss medicines can be integrated into everyday NHS care, especially within community and primary care settings.
- Outcomes: The degree of weight loss achieved and improvements in quality of life, particularly among people from disadvantaged areas.
- Health impact: The effects on obesity-related conditions, NHS service use, and healthcare expenditure.
- Social benefits: Whether improved health through weight loss can help individuals remain in work, reduce sick leave, and participate more fully in society.
Leading experts and national collaboration
Professor Jason Gill, Professor of Cardiometabolic Health at the University of Glasgow and the lead investigator, said:
“While tackling obesity requires multifactorial public health action, incretin therapies add a powerful new tool to the national obesity strategy. The burden of obesity is greatest in the most deprived segments of society and the status quo risks widening health inequalities. SCoMIS aims to be a landmark real-world study evaluating a new model of obesity care, providing incretin treatment via primary and community care to Scottish adults living with obesity, with a focus on those in the most economically deprived communities.”
The project is being developed in collaboration with the Universities of Dundee and Edinburgh, industry partners Novo Nordisk and IQVIA, and clinical leaders across Scotland. The consortium will also explore how AI-driven digital technologies can improve patient access, engagement, and data collection throughout the study.
Supporting innovation and evidence-based care
Jenni Minto, Scottish Minister for Public Health, highlighted Scotland’s leadership in advancing obesity research:
“This study places patients and communities at the heart of cutting-edge research into weight-loss medicines, ensuring we build the evidence needed to deliver the greatest benefit to those who need it most.”
UK Science Minister Lord Vallance also praised Scotland’s role in global medical innovation:
“Scotland has always been at the forefront of medical innovation and public health, and this initiative is further proof of the world-class expertise that can be found here. By learning how these weight-loss medicines work, and how we can support them to reach our most deprived areas, we can slash health inequalities in Scotland and the rest of the UK so that our obesity strategy delivers a real, lasting change.”
Looking ahead
Set to launch next year, the SCoMIS study represents one of the most ambitious real-world obesity trials in the UK to date. Its outcomes are expected to shape future national strategies on obesity care, providing a template for equitable access to advanced weight-loss treatments and supporting a healthier, more inclusive society.
CCH insights
This study is very much welcomed, although arguably long overdue. Obesity and associated diseases, most notably type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, are most prevalent in communities with high levels of deprivation, and are a huge cost to the NHS. People in these communities living with obesity should be prioritised in terms for GLP-1 therapy, as this should help to drive down health inequalities and provide massive future financial savings for the health service.
Read More
Semaglutide’s Cardioprotective Effects Extend Beyond Weight Loss, SELECT Trial Confirms
Key Takeaways:
- Semaglutide significantly reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in adults with overweight or obesity and established cardiovascular disease, regardless of baseline body weight.
- Reductions in waist circumference contributed partly – but not fully – to the observed cardioprotective benefits, suggesting mechanisms beyond weight loss.
- Early divergence in cardiovascular outcomes between the semaglutide and placebo groups indicates that benefits emerge rapidly after treatment initiation.
Semaglutide’s impact on heart health goes beyond weight loss
A landmark study published in The Lancet has revealed that semaglutide, a Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist (GLP-1RA), offers cardiovascular protection in people with overweight and obesity that cannot be explained by weight loss alone. The findings come from the large-scale SELECT trial, which explored the drug’s effect on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in individuals without diabetes but with established cardiovascular disease.
GLP-1 receptor agonists were originally developed for glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes but have since demonstrated additional benefits, including weight reduction and decreased cardiovascular risk. Obesity itself increases cardiovascular mortality and morbidity through metabolic, inflammatory, and haemodynamic pathways. However, simple measures such as body weight fail to differentiate between fat and lean mass or between subcutaneous and visceral fat – the latter being more strongly associated with cardiovascular disease.
Until now, the relationship between changes in adiposity induced by GLP-1RAs and subsequent cardiovascular outcomes has remained unclear.
About the SELECT trial
The SELECT trial was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study evaluating whether semaglutide, used alongside standard care, could reduce cardiovascular events in adults with overweight or obesity. The trial enrolled 17,604 participants aged 45 years or older with a body mass index (BMI) of at least 27 kg/m² and established cardiovascular disease (defined as a history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or symptomatic peripheral artery disease).
Participants were randomly assigned to receive either once-weekly semaglutide injections or a placebo, with a gradual 16-week dose escalation to a target of 2.4 mg from week 17 onwards. The primary endpoint was MACE – a composite measure including non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and cardiovascular death.
Researchers analysed both baseline measures of adiposity (including waist circumference and body weight) and treatment-induced changes over time. Associations between these factors and MACE were assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model, with additional analyses distinguishing early (week 20) and long-term (week 104) effects.
Key findings
The mean follow-up period was nearly 40 months, with participants exposed to semaglutide for an average of 33.3 months and placebo for 35.1 months. Across all baseline body habitus measures, semaglutide reduced MACE incidence compared with placebo.
Higher baseline BMI was associated with female sex, younger age, non-Asian nationality, higher blood pressure, prediabetes, and greater inflammatory burden. Within both study arms, individuals with lower baseline adiposity had a lower MACE risk. In the semaglutide group, MACE risk fell by approximately 4% for every 5 kg reduction in baseline weight, although this trend was not significant in the placebo group. For waist circumference, both groups showed a 4% lower risk per 5 cm smaller baseline measurement.
By week 20, the rate of first MACE events had already diverged between the groups (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58), demonstrating an early cardioprotective effect.
At this point, mean changes in body weight and waist circumference were −6.4% and −5.0 cm in the semaglutide group, compared with −0.8% and −1.1 cm in the placebo group. These early changes accounted for about 70% of the total reductions seen at week 104. Importantly, 11% of all MACE events occurred within the first 20 weeks of treatment.
In the semaglutide group, greater reductions in waist circumference were associated with a lower subsequent MACE risk (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.84–0.98; p = 0.02), while weight loss alone was not linearly linked to reduced risk. Among placebo recipients, those who lost at least 5% of their weight experienced higher MACE incidence and all-cause mortality, possibly reflecting unintentional or illness-related weight loss.
At week 104, semaglutide recipients who achieved the greatest weight loss had the lowest MACE incidence, whereas placebo recipients with comparable weight loss had the highest.
Waist circumference emerged as a stronger predictor
Analyses indicated that waist circumference reduction was a partial mediator of semaglutide’s cardiovascular benefits. Accounting for early changes in waist circumference reduced the treatment hazard ratio from 0.80 to 0.86 – suggesting that about one-third (33%) of the cardioprotective effect could be attributed to reduced abdominal fat, while the remainder likely involves other physiological mechanisms.
Crucially, time-varying changes in overall weight did not mediate the observed cardiovascular outcomes, underscoring that semaglutide’s heart-protective properties extend beyond simple weight loss.
Implications and limitations
The authors concluded that semaglutide was superior to placebo in reducing cardiovascular risk across all baseline weight and waist circumference levels, and that its benefits became evident early in treatment. They emphasised that early body weight reductions did not independently explain these benefits.
They cautioned, however, that analyses performed after randomisation were exploratory and not causal. The predominantly White, male study population also limits generalisability to broader groups, including women and ethnically diverse populations.
Despite these caveats, the findings strengthen the evidence that semaglutide’s cardioprotective effects go beyond adiposity reduction, pointing to additional metabolic, vascular, or anti-inflammatory mechanisms.
The SELECT trial was funded by Novo Nordisk, and is registered under ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03574597.
Read More
GLP-1 Receptor Agonists May Reduce Rheumatoid Arthritis Activity and Cardiovascular Risk in People with Obesity
Key Takeaways:
- GLP-1 receptor agonists were linked to reduced rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity and improved cardiovascular risk factors in people with obesity or overweight.
- Significant improvements were observed in inflammation markers, weight, and cholesterol levels over 12 months of treatment.
- Findings suggest GLP-1RAs could offer dual benefits by addressing both metabolic and inflammatory disease processes in RA.
GLP-1RAs show promise in managing RA and cardiometabolic health
The use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) was associated with improvements in both rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity and cardiovascular risk factors among people living with overweight or obesity, according to new research published in ACR Open Rheumatology.
Rheumatoid arthritis frequently coexists with obesity, which is known to exacerbate systemic inflammation, increase disease activity, and reduce response to treatment. Although GLP-1RAs are well established for treating obesity, type 2 diabetes, and for reducing cardiovascular risk, their potential role in inflammatory diseases such as RA has not been clearly defined.
Study overview
Researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) conducted a single-centre, retrospective observational study involving people with RA and a body mass index (BMI) of at least 27 kg/m². Participants were prescribed either semaglutide (oral or subcutaneous) or tirzepatide (subcutaneous) between 2018 and 2024.
Out of 554 screened individuals, 229 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 173 took the prescribed GLP-1RA and formed the treatment cohort, while 42 individuals served as controls, having been prescribed but not initiating therapy. Participants were evaluated at 3-month intervals for up to 12 months.
Baseline characteristics
Both groups were broadly similar in terms of BMI, RA duration, and the use of conventional, biologic, or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). However, diabetes (49% vs 14%) and hypertension (57% vs 38%) were more common in the treatment group.
The mean baseline BMI was 37.1 kg/m² among those receiving treatment and 35.3 kg/m² among control individuals. A greater proportion of participants in the treatment group were White (71% vs 47%).
Improvements in RA and cardiometabolic outcomes
People who took GLP-1RAs showed significantly greater improvements in several clinical measures compared with those who did not initiate therapy:
- RA disease activity scores: decreased by −0.03 versus an increase of +0.21 in controls (P = .03)
- Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores: decreased by −0.6 cm versus an increase of +1.3 cm in controls (P < .001)
- Weight: reduced by −6.2 kg versus −1.7 kg (P < .001)
- Total cholesterol: decreased by −10.3 mg/dL versus +0.3 mg/dL (P = .04)
- HbA1c: reduced by −0.4% versus +0.1% (P = .03)
Within the treatment group, significant reductions were also noted in inflammatory and lipid parameters, including:
- Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR): −5.4 mm/hr (P = .004)
- C-reactive protein (CRP): −0.9 mg/dL (P = .004)
- Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol: −7.3 mg/dL (P = .002)
- Triglycerides: −10.5 mg/dL (P = .004)
Tolerability and limitations
Adverse effects were relatively common, with 29% of participants discontinuing treatment, most frequently due to gastrointestinal symptoms or insurance-related issues.
Sensitivity analyses that accounted for comorbidities and serostatus did not significantly alter the study’s outcomes. However, researchers noted several limitations, including the single-centre, retrospective design, reliance on chart abstraction rather than validated disease activity indices, and the possibility of residual confounding.
Clinical implications
“Going forward, clinicians may consider integrating GLP-1RAs into the treatment regimens for patients with [RA and obesity], not only to target obesity-related complications but also possibly to target the underlying inflammatory disease process,” the authors concluded.
Some study authors disclosed affiliations with biotechnology, pharmaceutical, and medical device companies. A full list of disclosures is available in the original publication.
Read More
Use of GLP-1 Drugs Soars Among People Undergoing Bariatric Surgery, Study Finds
Key Takeaways:
- The use of GLP-1 receptor agonists such as semaglutide and tirzepatide among bariatric surgery patients increased sixteenfold between 2020 and 2024.
- Both people with and without Type 2 diabetes are increasingly using these drugs, showing a shift toward combination approaches in obesity management.
- Researchers emphasise the importance of multidisciplinary care and call for evidence-based guidelines to optimise the use of GLP-1 drugs alongside surgery.
A rapid evolution in obesity care
New research has revealed a dramatic increase in the use of weight loss medications among people undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery, signalling a major shift in the treatment of obesity and Type 2 diabetes.
The study will be presented at the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Clinical Congress 2025, held in Chicago from 4–7 October.
“There is no one-size-fits-all approach to treating obesity, metabolic syndrome, or diabetes and its related conditions,” said Dr Patrick J. Sweigert, senior author of the study and bariatric and foregut surgeon at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center in Columbus, Ohio. “We are entering a new world of multidisciplinary care pathways and a new frontier of weight management that is important for patients and surgeons to think about.”
About the study
The research team conducted a large cross-sectional study examining the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) – specifically semaglutide (marketed as Wegovy and Ozempic) and tirzepatide (marketed as Zepbound and Mounjaro) – among people undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery.
Using data from the Epic Cosmos database, which aggregates over 300 million patient records from healthcare institutions across the United States, Dr Sweigert and colleagues analysed nearly 365,000 individuals who underwent primary metabolic and bariatric surgery between 2018 and 2024.
The study assessed prescription patterns for semaglutide and tirzepatide, two of the most widely prescribed GLP-1RAs, to understand how their use has evolved before surgery.
Key findings
Preliminary findings showed a striking rise in GLP-1 prescriptions in the year preceding surgery – from 1.8% in early 2020 to 29.4% by the end of 2024, representing a sixteenfold increase.
Importantly, the surge was seen among people both with and without Type 2 diabetes, demonstrating the expanding role of GLP-1 drugs in obesity treatment beyond diabetes management.
Among those without Type 2 diabetes, use of GLP-1 drugs before surgery increased elevenfold – from 2.1% in early 2022 to 23.2% by late 2024. For those with Type 2 diabetes, preoperative use quadrupled – from 11.3% to 45.2% over the same period.
The median age of participants was 43 years, with a median preoperative body mass index (BMI) of 46. Women accounted for 80% of the cohort, and 33% had a diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes.
Changing perceptions and treatment pathways
Lead author Dr Stefanie C. Rohde, a general surgery resident at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, explained that the findings represent an evolution in how people view their treatment options for obesity.
“While patients previously believed they had to choose between GLP-1 receptor agonists and surgery, we are now seeing that people are using both,” said Dr Rohde. “We know that patients can use GLP-1s after bariatric surgery to amplify their weight loss. But all of this is still very new in terms of how to manage patients effectively.”
She added that real-world data such as that provided by the Epic Cosmos network could play a critical role in establishing evidence-based clinical guidelines for how and when to integrate GLP-1 therapies – whether before surgery, in combination with it, or during postoperative follow-up.
Limitations and next steps
The researchers acknowledged several limitations. As with many analyses of large health databases, there may be inaccuracies in medical record data. The study was also unable to confirm whether individuals filled or took their prescribed medications, which could affect the reliability of prescription data.
Despite these caveats, the authors believe the study offers valuable insights into emerging trends in combined pharmacological and surgical approaches to obesity care.
Study co-author Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul, MS, MPH, contributed to the data analysis and interpretation.
Looking ahead
The rapid rise in GLP-1 use among bariatric surgery candidates reflects a broader transformation in obesity treatment – one increasingly characterised by personalised, multidisciplinary, and data-informed care.
As Dr Sweigert noted, “We are entering a new world of multidisciplinary care pathways.” The challenge now lies in defining the most effective, safe, and sustainable ways to integrate these groundbreaking medications into established surgical treatment frameworks.
CCH insight:
These findings from the ACS, showing GLP-1 drug use prior to bariatric surgery, follow on from another study showing that many patients use GLP-1 drugs after surgery, in order to prevent weight regain. This will hopefully help to shift the thinking around obesity treatment. There is still a common perception that patients with obesity have the option of medication or bariatric surgery, and that it is a ‘one-and-done’ treatment. However, we know that obesity is a complex, chronic, relapsing disease which requires a long-term, multi-disciplinary approach. So we need medications, we need surgery and we need behavioural support and other interventions, used together in various combinations, at different times, to provide the life-long care that obesity patients require.
Read More
GLP-1 Medications Should Be First-Line Treatment for Obesity, Say European Experts
Key Takeaways:
- European experts recommend semaglutide and tirzepatide as the preferred first-line medications for treating obesity and related complications.
- The new European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO) guideline highlights tailored drug choices for specific obesity-linked conditions, such as heart disease, osteoarthritis, and sleep apnoea.
- Authors emphasise that managing obesity extends beyond weight loss, encompassing mental health, physical fitness, and quality of life.
New guidelines mark a turning point in obesity care
Two of the most widely prescribed weight-loss medications – semaglutide and tirzepatide – should now be considered the first treatment option for people living with obesity and associated complications, according to new guidance issued by the European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO).
The guideline, published in Nature Medicine, identifies semaglutide, the active compound in Novo Nordisk’s Wegovy and Ozempic, and tirzepatide, marketed as Zepbound and Mounjaro by Eli Lilly, as highly effective and clinically appropriate first-line treatments for most cases requiring substantial weight reduction.
When only moderate weight loss is needed, other pharmacological options may be suitable. These include liraglutide, an earlier and less potent medication from the same class, as well as naltrexone–bupropion and phentermine–topiramate.
Although the recommendations are non-binding for European nations, they signal a major shift in the medical management of obesity across the continent.
Transforming obesity care
“Semaglutide, tirzepatide, and other drugs from the class known as GLP-1 agonists are completely transforming care of obesity and its complications,” said co-author Dr Andreea Ciudin of Vall d’Hebron University Hospital in Barcelona.
Dr Ciudin noted that while no single treatment algorithm can replace the nuanced clinical judgement of healthcare professionals, the new guidance is intended to support evidence-based decision-making and improve the consistency of obesity care across Europe.
Tailoring treatments to specific conditions
To develop the recommendations, the EASO guideline authors reviewed previous clinical trial data assessing medication efficacy, safety, and impact in individuals with obesity-related comorbidities.
The panel determined that tirzepatide should be prioritised for those experiencing obstructive sleep apnoea, whereas semaglutide should be considered first for individuals with knee osteoarthritis.
For people with metabolic or immune-related complications, the recommendations include semaglutide as a preferred option for those with existing cardiovascular disease or a history of stroke, tirzepatide for individuals with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and either drug for those with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes.
GLP-1 receptor agonists were initially developed to manage type 2 diabetes but have since shown remarkable efficacy in promoting sustained weight reduction and improving obesity-related outcomes.
Balancing costs and benefits
The guideline acknowledges that GLP-1 drugs are expensive and that economic considerations are complex. However, the authors argue that health systems should account for the long-term costs of untreated obesity.
“The cost of not treating obesity at early stages, thus enabling the progression to complications and end-organ damage, should be weighed equally in health policy and clinical decision-making,” the guideline authors wrote.
They added that effective obesity management should not be confined to weight loss alone but should also prioritise mental well-being, physical fitness, social participation, and quality of life.
Emerging evidence and ongoing updates
The authors acknowledged that many newer medications have not yet been evaluated for the treatment of individual complications. Nevertheless, the consistent association between weight reduction and improvements in related conditions supports their broader therapeutic potential.
According to the guideline, there is growing evidence that GLP-1 receptor agonists may also benefit individuals with chronic kidney disease, neurodegenerative conditions, polycystic ovary syndrome, certain cancers, and mental health disorders.
“Given the rapid advances in the field of medications to treat obesity, EASO intends to update the present treatment algorithm regularly to incorporate the latest available evidence,” said Professor Volkan Yumuk, President of EASO and Professor at Istanbul University–Cerrahpaşa.
Lifestyle interventions remain essential
The EASO guidance complements a June advisory jointly issued by the American College of Lifestyle Medicine, the American Society for Nutrition, the Obesity Medicine Association, and The Obesity Society. That advisory stressed that pharmacological treatment should always be combined with lifestyle and nutritional interventions.
“Although GLP‐1s alone can produce significant weight reduction and related health benefits, several challenges limit its long‐term success for individuals and populations,” the advisory stated.
It cited factors such as gastrointestinal side effects, nutrient deficiencies, muscle and bone loss, high costs, frequent discontinuation, and the risk of weight regain.
Read More
Bariatric Surgery Delivers Greater Long-Term Benefits Than GLP-1 Medicines Alone, Cleveland Clinic Study Finds
Key Takeaways:
- People with obesity and type 2 diabetes who underwent bariatric surgery lived longer and experienced fewer serious complications than those treated with GLP-1 receptor agonist medicines alone.
- Surgery was associated with a lower risk of death, cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, and diabetes-related eye damage over a 10-year period.
- Patients who had surgery lost more weight, achieved better blood sugar control, and relied less on medications for diabetes, blood pressure, and cholesterol.
Major Cleveland Clinic study compares treatments
A large-scale study conducted by Cleveland Clinic has shown that people living with obesity and type 2 diabetes who undergo bariatric (metabolic) surgery experience significantly better long-term outcomes compared with those treated only with GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) medicines.
The research, published in Nature Medicine, followed nearly 4,000 patients and found that surgery was linked to longer life expectancy, greater weight loss, improved blood sugar control, and reduced reliance on diabetes and cardiovascular medicines.
“Even with today’s best medicines, metabolic surgery offers unique and lasting benefits for people with obesity and diabetes,” said Ali Aminian, M.D., Director of Cleveland Clinic’s Bariatric & Metabolic Institute and primary investigator of the study. “The benefits we observed went beyond weight loss. Surgery was linked to fewer heart problems, less kidney disease and even lower rates of diabetes-related eye damage.”
Study design and findings
The M6 study (Macrovascular and Microvascular Morbidity and Mortality after Metabolic Surgery versus Medicines) included 3,932 adults with both diabetes and obesity who received care at Cleveland Clinic over a period of up to 10 years.
- 1,657 participants underwent metabolic surgery, including gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy.
- 2,275 participants were treated with GLP-1 medicines such as liraglutide, dulaglutide, exenatide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide.
The median follow-up was 5.9 years (interquartile range 4.4–7.6 years).
Key outcomes:
At the 10-year mark, patients who underwent metabolic surgery had significantly better outcomes:
- 32% lower risk of death
- 35% lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including heart attack, heart failure, or stroke
- 47% lower risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD)
- 54% lower risk of diabetes-related retinopathy (eye damage)
The 10-year cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality was 9.0% (95% CI 6.8–10.8%) in the metabolic surgery group, compared with 12.4% (95% CI 9.9–15.2%) in the GLP-1RA group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.48–0.96; P = 0.028).
The 10-year cumulative incidence of MACE was 23.7% (95% CI 20.0–27.6%) in the metabolic surgery group and 34.0% (95% CI 28.1–44.2%) in the GLP-1RA group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.51–0.82; P < 0.001).
On average:
- People who had surgery lost 21.6% of their body weight over 10 years.
- People treated with GLP-1 medicines lost 6.8% of their body weight.
- Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), a key marker of average blood sugar, improved by -0.86% with surgery compared with -0.23% with GLP-1 medicines.
In addition, surgery patients required fewer prescriptions for diabetes, blood pressure, and cholesterol management.
Expert perspectives
The findings underscore the long-term advantages of bariatric surgery even in the current era of advanced GLP-1 treatments.
“Even in the era of these powerful new drugs to treat obesity and diabetes, metabolic surgery may provide additional benefits, including a survival advantage,” said Steven Nissen, M.D., Chief Academic Officer of the Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute at Cleveland Clinic and senior author of the study.
Dr Aminian emphasised the importance of maintaining surgery as a treatment option:
“Our findings indicate that surgery should remain an important treatment option for obesity and diabetes. These long-term benefits are harder to achieve with GLP-1 medicines alone, as many patients stop using the medications over time.”
Study limitations and future research
The authors highlighted that the study was observational, not a randomised controlled trial. This means that while strong associations were observed, direct comparisons may be influenced by unmeasured factors.
In addition, the study did not focus exclusively on the most recent and highly effective GLP-1 medicines. The authors noted that future trials should directly compare metabolic surgery with newer GLP-1 therapies, such as semaglutide and tirzepatide, to help guide clinical decision-making.
Read More
Oral GLP-1 Therapy Orforglipron Demonstrates Significant Weight Loss in Landmark Trial
Key Takeaways:
- The ATTAIN-1 phase III trial found that the oral GLP-1 drug orforglipron led to clinically meaningful weight loss and metabolic improvements in people living with obesity or overweight.
- Average weight loss reached 12.4% with the highest dose, alongside significant improvements in waist circumference, blood pressure, and lipid profiles.
- Orforglipron may provide a more accessible alternative for individuals reluctant to use injections or living in areas with limited cold-storage infrastructure.
A new oral alternative to injectable GLP-1 therapies
An investigational oral GLP-1 drug, orforglipron, has been shown to promote substantial weight loss and improve cardiovascular and metabolic health markers in a large, international phase III clinical trial. The ATTAIN-1 study, published on 17 September in The New England Journal of Medicine, was led by researchers from Weill Cornell Medicine, McMaster University, York University, and collaborating institutions.
The study enrolled 3,127 participants with obesity or overweight who had obesity-related complications such as hypertension. None of the participants had diabetes. Participants were randomised to receive a placebo or one of three daily oral doses of orforglipron – 6 mg, 12 mg, or 36 mg – alongside guidance on maintaining a healthy diet and regular physical activity.
Meaningful weight loss across all doses
Over 72 weeks, individuals treated with orforglipron experienced dose-dependent weight loss:
- 7.8% reduction in body weight with the 6 mg dose
- 9.3% reduction with the 12 mg dose
- 12.4% reduction with the 36 mg dose
By comparison, participants in the placebo group lost an average of just 2.1% of their initial body weight.
Adverse events were consistent with those observed for other GLP-1 receptor agonists, mainly mild to moderate gastrointestinal effects including nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea.
Clinical and public health implications
“The findings suggest that orforglipron could offer an important new option for people with obesity, especially those reluctant to use injections or who live in places where cold storage for injectable medications is limited,” said Dr Louis Aronne, Director of the Comprehensive Weight Control Center and Sanford I. Weill Professor of Metabolic Research at Weill Cornell Medicine, who served as a lead investigator for the ATTAIN-1 trial.
“ATTAIN-1 represents another milestone in developing effective treatments for obesity. In addition, the distribution and storage of a small molecule is less expensive, and scalability is simpler. Given the worldwide demand, these are important factors in making treatment available to those in need,” Dr Aronne added.
Dr Aronne is also an internist specialising in diabetes and obesity at NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center.
Improvements beyond weight loss
Although the weight reduction achieved with orforglipron was slightly lower than that typically seen with injectable GLP-1 therapies such as semaglutide or tirzepatide, the study reported robust cardiometabolic benefits. Participants on orforglipron demonstrated greater reductions in:
- Waist circumference
- Systolic blood pressure
- Non-HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels
- Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)
These improvements underline the drug’s potential to reduce the risk of major obesity-related complications, including cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes.
Why oral GLP-1 drugs could be game-changing
Injectable GLP-1 drugs, which are peptide-based therapies, have already transformed obesity and type 2 diabetes management worldwide. When taken long-term, they can help people lose more than 15% of their body weight and substantially lower the risk of heart attack, stroke, kidney disease, and sleep apnoea.
However, injectable GLP-1 medications require cold storage and are vulnerable to breakdown by stomach enzymes if taken orally. Orforglipron is different – it is a “small-molecule” drug designed to be taken as a pill, potentially lowering costs and simplifying global distribution.
Study scope and sponsorship
The ATTAIN-1 trial was sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company, which manufactures orforglipron as well as the injectable GLP-1 drug tirzepatide (marketed as Mounjaro for type 2 diabetes and Zepbound for chronic weight management). The trial was conducted across 137 sites in nine countries, including the United States, Canada, Japan, Brazil, Spain, and Saudi Arabia.
Disclosure: Dr Louis Aronne serves as a paid consultant and advisory board member for Eli Lilly and Company.
Read More