weight loss Tag

GLP-1 Weight Loss Is Mostly Driven by Fat Loss, Not Muscle

Key Takeaways:

• GLP-1 receptor agonists and dual GLP-1/GIP therapies lead to significant weight loss, primarily through reductions in fat mass rather than muscle.
  
• Improvements in body composition, including reductions in visceral fat, occur as early as three months into treatment.
  
• Although some lean body mass loss is observed, it is relatively modest compared with overall weight loss, suggesting a favourable pattern of change.
  
  
  

GLP-1 therapies in the context of obesity care

A recent study published in the International Journal of Obesity examined how glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and dual GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide agonists affect body weight and composition in adults living with overweight or obesity.

The global prevalence of obesity has risen substantially in recent decades. This condition is closely linked to a range of cardiometabolic complications that can reduce both quality of life and life expectancy. As a result, effective obesity management typically requires a personalised, multidisciplinary approach. This may include behavioural support, dietary changes, physical activity, pharmacological treatments, and, in some cases, surgical intervention.

GLP-1 receptor agonists and related incretin-based therapies have emerged as an important pharmacological option. These treatments are known to support sustained weight loss and improve obesity-related comorbidities. They have also demonstrated cardioprotective effects. However, while these therapies predominantly reduce fat body mass, they may also lead to some loss of lean body mass, which has raised concerns, particularly for older adults and people at risk of frailty.

Study design and methods

To better understand these effects, researchers conducted a comprehensive evaluation of clinical studies assessing GLP-1-based therapies and their impact on body composition.

Databases including Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus were systematically searched for relevant studies involving adults with overweight or obesity, with or without type 2 diabetes. Following removal of duplicate records, studies were screened based on titles, abstracts, and full texts to determine eligibility.

The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using established tools. Meta-analyses were then performed on studies that provided numerical data on changes in body composition and anthropometric measures. Statistical analyses used random-effects models, with subgroup analyses based on drug type and treatment duration. Publication bias was evaluated using Egger’s test.

In total, 36 studies were included in the qualitative review, with 24 contributing to the meta-analyses. Most studies were conducted in Europe and Asia, and many reported outcomes at six months. Twenty-four studies included people living with type 2 diabetes. The most frequently studied medications were liraglutide and semaglutide. Body composition was commonly assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Changes in weight and body composition

Early effects at three months

After three months of treatment, participants experienced a significant reduction in body mass of approximately 9 percent. This effect was particularly notable among those receiving beinaglutide.

Substantial improvements in body composition were also observed. Visceral adipose tissue area decreased by 29.25 cm², while fat body mass was reduced by 17 percent. Lean body mass showed a smaller but statistically significant reduction of 2 percent.

In addition, body mass index decreased by 2.96 kg/m² and waist circumference by 9.6 cm.

Outcomes at six months

At six months, body mass remained significantly reduced, with an average decrease of 5 percent.

Both fat body mass and lean body mass declined further, by 6 percent and 1 percent respectively. Skeletal muscle mass showed a modest reduction of 3 percent. Visceral adipose tissue continued to decrease, with a reduction of 32.31 cm².

Body mass index fell by 2.40 kg/m², while waist circumference decreased by 2.3 cm.

Longer-term results at twelve months

At twelve months, body mass was reduced by 4 percent, with continued decreases in body mass index of 1.74 kg/m² and waist circumference of 3.2 cm.

Both fat body mass and lean body mass were reduced by 4 percent. The most pronounced reductions were reported in a study involving liraglutide, although the authors noted considerable variability between studies and advised caution when comparing specific agents.

Egger’s test indicated some publication bias in outcomes reported at three months, but no significant bias was observed at later time points.

Interpreting fat loss and muscle preservation

Overall, the findings demonstrate that GLP-1-based therapies produce meaningful improvements in key measures associated with obesity, including body mass, body mass index, and waist circumference, across multiple time points.

The most rapid and substantial changes occurred within the first three months of treatment. Across all timeframes, reductions in fat mass, particularly visceral fat, were more pronounced than reductions in lean mass.

The authors described this pattern as “quality” weight loss, characterised by a predominance of fat mass reduction with relative preservation of lean tissue. Importantly, no single GLP-1 receptor agonist was found to be superior in preserving lean mass.

Implications for clinical practice and future research

These findings have important implications for clinical care. While some degree of lean mass loss occurs with GLP-1-based therapies, the overall pattern of weight loss appears favourable, particularly given the substantial reductions in fat mass and visceral adiposity.

Future research should focus on optimising treatment strategies that combine pharmacotherapy with lifestyle interventions. In particular, there is a need to explore approaches that support the preservation of lean mass, such as targeted nutritional strategies and resistance training programmes.

Such considerations are especially important for people at higher risk of sarcopenia, including older adults and those with existing muscle loss.

CCH insights:

These results are encouraging, but it is important not to become complacent about lean mass loss during weight loss. The studies analysed here involved average weight losses of less than 10% of body weight, but some people can lose 15-20% of body weight on GLP-1 therapy – do they lose similar proportions of body fat and lean tissue? All patients on GLP-1 therapy should receive advice on lifestyle measures to help minimise lean tissue loss.

Read More

Automated Weight Loss Programme Shows Promise for People Living with Cancer in Landmark Trial

Key Takeaways: 

• A fully automated, web-based programme delivered clinically meaningful weight loss in people living with and beyond cancer, without any in-person support
  
• More than 43 percent of participants achieved at least 3 percent weight loss, with nearly one in three reaching 5 percent or more
  
• The intervention also improved a range of health outcomes, including diet quality, physical functioning, and cardiometabolic markers
  
  
  

A new model for post-cancer care

A large national randomised clinical trial has demonstrated that a fully automated, web-based weight loss intervention can deliver substantial health benefits for people living with and beyond cancer. The programme, developed by researchers at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, represents a significant shift in how post-cancer care may be delivered in the future.

Published in the Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, the study reported the highest level of weight loss ever achieved through a fully automated intervention in this population. The programme, known as the AMPLIFY Diet (AiM, PLan and act on LIFestYles), was designed to provide structured, evidence-based lifestyle support without requiring direct clinician involvement.

Addressing a major unmet need

A substantial proportion of people living with and beyond cancer are also living with overweight or obesity. In the United States, this figure is estimated to be around 70 percent. This places individuals at increased risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, functional decline, cancer recurrence, and the development of second primary cancers.

Despite this, access to specialist oncology dietitians remains limited. Traditional weight management programmes often rely on in-person consultations or regular coaching, which can be difficult to scale and may not be accessible to all patients.

The AMPLIFY Diet intervention was developed specifically to address these barriers by delivering personalised nutrition and behavioural support entirely online.

A fully automated intervention

The programme operates without live coaching, counselling calls, or face-to-face appointments. Instead, it uses a structured digital platform that includes weekly interactive sessions, goal-setting tools, progress monitoring, and automated personalised feedback.

Participants engage with the system independently, receiving guidance that is grounded in established behavioural and nutritional science. This approach allows for scalability while maintaining a consistent standard of care.

“This is a game changer for cancer survivorship care,” said Wendy Demark-Wahnefried, Ph.D., R.D., senior author and professor at UAB’s School of Health Professions and O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center. “We showed that a completely automated online program grounded in decades of behavioral and nutrition science can safely and effectively help cancer survivors lose weight and improve their health at scale.”

Study design and participant profile

Between 2020 and 2024, the study enrolled 349 participants aged between 50 and 82 years from 31 states across the United States. All participants were living with and beyond cancers associated with obesity.

The cohort included individuals with a range of cancer types, including breast, colorectal, prostate, endometrial, ovarian, thyroid, renal, and haematologic cancers. Participants were randomly assigned to either the AMPLIFY Diet programme or a control group receiving standard survivorship information.

Clinically meaningful weight loss outcomes

After six months, the results showed clear differences between the intervention and control groups.

More than 43 percent of participants in the AMPLIFY Diet group achieved weight loss of at least 3 percent of their body weight. In comparison, only 13 percent of those receiving usual care reached this threshold.

In addition, nearly one in three participants in the intervention group lost at least 5 percent of their body weight. This level of weight loss is widely associated with reductions in cardiovascular risk and improvements in cancer-related outcomes.

On average, weight loss in the intervention group was nearly five times greater than that observed in the control group.

Broader health improvements

The benefits of the programme extended beyond weight loss alone. Participants in the AMPLIFY Diet group experienced improvements across multiple domains of health and wellbeing.

These included reductions in waist circumference and overall caloric intake, as well as improvements in diet quality. Biochemical markers also shifted in a favourable direction, with lower circulating levels of leptin, a hormone associated with cancer progression and cardiometabolic disease.

Further gains were observed in blood pressure, physical functioning, and cognitive performance. Participants also reported improvements in depression and their ability to engage in social roles, suggesting a broader impact on quality of life.

Strong engagement without human support

One notable finding from the study was the level of participant engagement. Individuals completed an average of 60 percent of the weekly sessions, which is considerably higher than engagement rates typically reported in other digital lifestyle interventions.

This suggests that a well-designed automated system can maintain user engagement even in the absence of direct human interaction.

Implications for scalable care

Unlike many conventional weight management programmes, the AMPLIFY Diet intervention does not require ongoing staff involvement. This makes it particularly well suited for integration into healthcare systems, cancer centres, and community-based services.

The ability to deliver consistent, evidence-based care at scale may help address longstanding gaps in survivorship support, particularly in settings where specialist resources are limited.

The role of behavioural and nutritional care

The researchers emphasise that lifestyle-based interventions remain a cornerstone of care for people living with and beyond cancer, particularly as pharmacological approaches continue to evolve.

“Behavioral and nutritional interventions are essential,” Demark-Wahnefried said. “Diet quality, muscle preservation, cognition, and long-term sustainability of a healthful lifestyle and body weight are critical for cancer survivors, and even if weight loss medications eventually receive broadscale endorsement, they alone do not address all of these needs.”

Future directions

The research team is now focusing on expanding the reach of the AMPLIFY Diet programme across both clinical and non-clinical settings. The aim is to improve access to effective survivorship care while also contributing to broader cancer prevention efforts.

The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health and the American Cancer Society.

Read More

Can Less Be More? Reduced GLP-1 Dosing May Sustain – and Even Enhance – Weight Loss

Key Takeaways: 

• Structured reduction in GLP-1 receptor agonist dosing frequency may allow continued weight loss while lowering treatment burden
  
• Cardiometabolic improvements achieved during weekly dosing appear to be maintained with less frequent dosing
  
• Early evidence suggests some individuals may not require high or frequent dosing to sustain weight loss, although larger trials are needed
  
  
  

A new approach to GLP-1 treatment

Emerging evidence suggests that reducing the frequency of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) dosing may still deliver sustained benefits for people living with obesity. Data presented at the Obesity Medicine Association’s annual conference indicate that a structured, gradual de-escalation strategy could maintain, and in some cases enhance, weight loss outcomes while reducing the burden of ongoing treatment.

This finding challenges the prevailing assumption that continuous, high-frequency dosing is required to preserve the benefits of these therapies.

Continued weight loss despite reduced dosing

The research, led by Mitch Biermann, MD, PhD, examined outcomes in individuals who transitioned from weekly GLP-1 RA dosing to less frequent schedules. Reflecting on the results, Biermann noted:

“What I found was actually surprising, where in addition to losing weight initially on the weekly regimen, people actually lost further weight on the every-other-week regimen,” Mitch Biermann, MD, PhD, an obesity medicine physician and scientist at Scripps Health, told Healio. “I was just hoping people would break even, not get an additional 2% weight loss.”

This observation suggests that, for some individuals, reduced dosing frequency does not simply preserve prior weight loss but may contribute to further reductions.

Addressing a common patient concern

The study was partly motivated by a frequent question from patients considering GLP-1 therapy. As Biermann explained:

“The No. 1 question patients have when they’re deciding to start one of these medicines is, ‘Do I have to be on this every week for the rest of my life? Do I have to take this forever?’” he said. “Patients ask that about certain medicines and not others. It usually correlates with the stigma around the disease. They always ask about it for weight loss medicine.”

This highlights an important dimension of obesity care – long-term treatment expectations and the role of stigma in shaping patient concerns.

Study design and patient cohort

The analysis was based on a retrospective case series involving 30 adults who had been prescribed either semaglutide (Wegovy or Ozempic) or tirzepatide (Mounjaro). All participants had experienced a plateau in weight loss during standard weekly treatment.

Participants agreed to reduce their dosing frequency while maintaining their effective dose. The adjusted schedules included:

• Every 10 to 14 days (n = 6)
• Every two weeks (n = 17)
• Longer than every two weeks (n = 7)

The mean follow-up period was 36 weeks.

Body composition and weight outcomes

Following the transition to reduced dosing, participants continued to lose weight, with reported reductions of 72.4 ± 2.2 kg (P < .01). In addition to overall weight loss, improvements were observed in body composition:

• Reductions in body fat mass
• Decreases in average percentage body fat
• Lower truncal fat mass

At the same time, skeletal muscle mass increased slightly from 30.33 ± 1.27 to 30.63 ± 1.25, suggesting that weight loss was not associated with disproportionate muscle loss.

Sustained cardiometabolic benefits

Importantly, key metabolic improvements achieved during weekly dosing were maintained after reducing treatment frequency:

• Glycaemic control: HbA1c improved from 5.6% ± 0.13% before treatment to 5.1% ± 0.1% during weekly dosing (P < .001), with no change during reduced dosing
• Triglycerides: Levels decreased from 121 ± 11.3 mg/dL to 84.3 ± 9.6 mg/dL during weekly dosing (P < .001) and remained stable at 74.8 ± 4.1 mg/dL
• Mean arterial pressure: Reduced from 90.5 ± 2 mm Hg to 84.8 ± 2.1 mm Hg (P < .05), remaining stable at 85.1 ± 1.5 mm Hg during maintenance

The proportion of participants meeting criteria for metabolic syndrome also declined, from nearly 83% before treatment to 68% during weekly dosing and 58.6% following dose reduction.

Interpreting the findings

The study authors suggest that lower levels of GLP-1 receptor stimulation may be sufficient to maintain weight loss once it has been achieved. Biermann offered the following interpretation:

“that you don’t need much of these hormones to maintain weight loss, even though you need a lot of them to reduce weight.”

He also drew a parallel with physical activity:

“Exercise doesn’t cause people to lose a ton of weight. It causes people to maintain their weight if they lose it by another method for the most part,” he said. “And that matches this hormone data, because that 30% increase [in hormone levels] you get on GLP-1s from exercise is probably enough to maintain your weight loss.”

Limitations and considerations

The findings should be interpreted cautiously. The study was small, non-randomised, and based on a retrospective case series. In addition, the cohort lacked diversity, with only four participants not identified as white and just two individuals living with class II or III obesity.

These limitations mean that the results may not be generalisable to broader populations.

Implications for clinical practice

Despite its limitations, the study offers a potentially important insight into long-term obesity management. Gradual dose reduction may represent a viable strategy for some individuals seeking to balance efficacy with treatment burden.

As Biermann concluded:

“I think it’s an option that works for many people, [particularly] when we don’t study how to stop medicine in general,” Biermann told Healio.

“I think it’s nice to have some published data on the average effectiveness of this strategy, even though it’s not a randomized controlled trial,” he said.

Looking ahead

Further research, particularly large-scale randomised controlled trials, will be essential to determine whether reduced dosing strategies can be safely and effectively implemented in routine care. For now, these findings provide an early signal that long-term GLP-1 therapy may not need to follow a one-size-fits-all model.

Source: Healio

Read More

Semaglutide and Bimagrumab Combination Shows Greater Weight Loss While Preserving Muscle Mass

Key Takeaways: 

• A phase 2 clinical trial found that combining semaglutide with the antibody bimagrumab produced greater overall weight loss while largely preserving lean body mass.
  
• Participants receiving the two-drug combination lost 22.1% of body weight on average, with over 90% of the reduction coming from fat mass.
  
• The findings highlight the importance of focusing on body composition rather than weight alone when evaluating treatments for people living with obesity.
  
  
  

Combining two mechanisms to improve obesity treatment

A recent clinical trial has found that combining the GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide with bimagrumab, an antibody that blocks activin signalling pathways, may produce greater weight loss while preserving lean body mass.

The findings were reported in the paper “Bimagrumab and semaglutide alone or in combination for the treatment of obesity: a phase 2 randomized clinical trial”, published in the journal Nature Medicine. The study describes the results of the BELIEVE trial, led by Dr Steven Heymsfield of the Pennington Biomedical Research Center.

GLP-1–based therapies have become highly effective tools for reducing body weight in people living with obesity. However, a recognised limitation of these therapies is that up to 40% of the weight lost may come from lean mass, which includes skeletal muscle and connective tissue.

The BELIEVE trial explored whether combining semaglutide with bimagrumab could address this issue by enhancing fat loss while protecting lean body mass.

Why lean mass preservation matters

Historically, obesity treatment has often focused on reductions in body weight as the primary outcome. However, researchers increasingly emphasise the importance of preserving muscle mass, which plays a vital role in both physical function and metabolic health.

Dr Heymsfield explained that maintaining lean mass could be particularly important for people living with obesity who may already be at risk of low muscle mass.

“Obesity treatment has traditionally focused on the number on a scale. Patients with obesity who are at risk for low muscle mass, affecting both physical and metabolic function, may benefit from treatments that maximize fat mass reduction while preserving skeletal muscle,” said Heymsfield, who is an LSU Boyd Professor and director of the Metabolism and Body Composition Laboratory.

He also highlighted the complementary biological mechanisms of the two drugs.

“Bimagrumab and semaglutide work through distinct biological pathways, and when combined, we observed not only a preservation of lean mass but also an additive reduction in fat mass that exceeded what either therapy achieved alone.”

Design of the BELIEVE phase 2 trial

The BELIEVE study was designed as a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating the effects of semaglutide and bimagrumab used either alone or in combination.

Participants were randomly assigned to several treatment groups:

• Bimagrumab only
  
• Semaglutide only
  
• Combination therapy
  

Each medication was also administered at two different dosing levels:

• Bimagrumab: 10 mg/kg or 30 mg/kg
  
• Semaglutide: 1.0 mg or 2.4 mg
  

Because of these dosing combinations, the trial ultimately included nine randomised groups.

Bimagrumab was administered every 12 weeks, while semaglutide was given once weekly. Participants were followed over a 72-week treatment period.

Weight loss and body composition outcomes

The results showed clear differences between the treatment groups in terms of both total weight loss and the composition of that weight loss.

Participants receiving bimagrumab alone experienced an average weight reduction of 10.8%. Notably, all of this reduction was attributable to fat mass, while lean mass increased by 2.5%.

Those treated with semaglutide alone lost an average of 15.7% of body weight, with 71.8% of the weight loss coming from fat mass.

The most striking results were seen in participants receiving the combination therapy. These individuals experienced an average weight loss of 22.1%, with 92.8% of the weight reduction attributable to fat mass, while lean mass was largely preserved.

These findings suggest that the combination therapy may offer a way to achieve substantial reductions in body weight while maintaining the muscle mass that supports metabolic health and physical function.

Improvements in metabolic and inflammatory markers

Beyond weight loss and body composition, the study also identified several favourable metabolic changes.

Participants experienced up to an 83% reduction in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), an inflammatory marker that is associated with increased cardiovascular risk.

The study also reported a substantial increase in adiponectin, a hormone that plays an important role in:

• Improving insulin sensitivity
  
• Supporting fat metabolism
  
• Promoting anti-inflammatory processes
  

Among participants who had indicators of prediabetes at baseline, some of the groups receiving the two-drug combination experienced complete reversion to normoglycaemia, meaning all participants in those groups moved from a prediabetic state to normal blood glucose levels.

Safety and tolerability

Overall, the drug combination was generally well tolerated by participants. Reported side effects were broadly consistent with the known safety profiles of the individual drugs.

However, researchers noted that participants receiving bimagrumab experienced some common adverse events, including:

• Mild-to-moderate acne
  
• Muscle spasms
  

The study authors emphasised the need for continued clinical development and further investigation to better understand these effects.

Moving beyond the number on the scale

The BELIEVE trial also underscores a broader shift in how obesity treatments may be evaluated in the future.

Rather than focusing solely on weight or body mass index, researchers increasingly argue that body composition measures, such as the proportion of fat mass and lean mass, provide more meaningful insight into treatment effectiveness and overall health outcomes for people living with obesity.

Keeping pace with how GLP-1 therapies work and how to weigh emerging trial evidence like this is the focus of professional training such as the College of Contemporary Health’s GLP-1RAs in Focus, a CPD-accredited online short course.

Funding and study oversight

The study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company. The trial was originally designed by Versanis Bio, a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly.

Versanis Bio oversaw the clinical trial and provided partial funding before its acquisition by Lilly.

CCH insight:

The results for bimagrumab are very exciting. Although overall weight loss was less for bimagrumab than semaglutide, the amount of fat lost was very similar, but with retention or even increase of muscle mass. As muscle is an important metabolic tissue, you can argue that in this case the lesser weight loss is a better outcome than the higher weight loss, because the weight that is retained is muscle, not fat because the weight that is retained is muscle, not fat. Making sense of fast-moving evidence like this – and the mechanisms behind it – is exactly what CCH’s GLP-1RAs in Focus – Why Drugs Like Ozempic Work CPD short course (2 CPD hours, fully online, CPD-accredited) is built to support, giving healthcare professionals a clear grounding in how these medications work and how to appraise the evidence with confidence, whether or not they prescribe.

Explore GLP-1RAs in Focus →

Read More

Mice Study Suggests Tirzepatide Enhances Metabolism by Activating Brown Fat in Addition to Reducing Weight

Key Takeaways: 

• A preclinical mouse study indicates that tirzepatide may improve metabolism not only by reducing appetite, but also by activating brown adipose tissue.
  
• The research suggests that this activation increases energy expenditure and supports improvements in blood glucose and lipid levels.
  
• Findings remain preliminary and require confirmation in human studies before clinical conclusions can be drawn.
  
  
  

A closer look at tirzepatide’s metabolic effects

Tirzepatide has transformed the treatment landscape for people living with obesity and for those with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. Despite its established clinical benefits, the precise molecular and cellular mechanisms underpinning its effects are not yet fully understood.

A recent study conducted in mice provides new insight into how the drug may influence metabolism beyond its well-recognised impact on body weight. The findings suggest that tirzepatide directly activates brown adipose tissue, a specialised form of fat involved in energy expenditure. According to the researchers, this discovery helps clarify how the drug works and may inform the development of more comprehensive treatments for obesity and related metabolic diseases.

The study was led by Marion Peyrou, Ramón y Cajal researcher at the Faculty of Biology and the Institute of Biomedicine of the University of Barcelona, the Sant Joan de Déu Research Institute and the CIBER in Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition.

A dual-action therapy

Tirzepatide, marketed under the name Mounjaro, is approved for weight management in adults living with obesity or with overweight accompanied by comorbidities. It is also indicated for the treatment of inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.

Unlike earlier anti-obesity medicines, tirzepatide acts simultaneously on two hormonal receptors – glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). This dual mechanism leads to substantial reductions in body weight, primarily through decreased food intake driven by appetite suppression.

However, appetite reduction alone may not explain the full spectrum of its metabolic effects.

Investigating effects on adipose tissue

To better understand how tirzepatide exerts its actions, researchers conducted a detailed analysis of its effects on different fat depots in an experimental mouse model. Such in-depth tissue analysis is not feasible in humans.

In the study, mice were rendered obese through a high-fat diet and then treated with tirzepatide. Their outcomes were compared with a control group of mice that consumed the same quantity of food but did not receive the drug. This design allowed the researchers to distinguish between effects caused directly by the drug and those resulting solely from reduced caloric intake.

The analysis revealed that tirzepatide activates brown adipose tissue. Unlike white adipose tissue, which primarily stores excess energy and accumulates in obesity, brown adipose tissue specialises in burning calories to generate heat.

“This activation is associated with an increased capacity to burn metabolic energy and with the production of batokines by brown adipose tissue, molecules that are beneficial for metabolism,” says Marion Peyrou.

Metabolic benefits beyond appetite suppression

The activation of brown adipose tissue is particularly significant because it indicates that tirzepatide may exert metabolic benefits independent of weight loss due to appetite reduction.

“This drug not only reduces body weight, but also has beneficial effects on metabolism. Active brown adipose tissue ‘burns’ glucose and fat within the body, which would contribute to its positive effect not only in reducing body weight, but also in lowering blood glucose and fat levels, and improving metabolism,” the researcher points out.

By enhancing the body’s ability to utilise both glucose and lipids, activation of brown fat may contribute to improved glycaemic control and lipid profiles in addition to weight reduction.

Implications for obesity treatment strategies

For several years, activation of brown adipose tissue has been viewed as a promising strategy for tackling obesity and metabolic disorders. However, previous pharmacological attempts to stimulate brown fat have frequently been limited by adverse effects, particularly cardiovascular complications.

“Tirzepatide, although it activates brown adipose tissue, does not have these negative effects; on the contrary, it shows cardiovascular benefits. If our findings are confirmed in humans, it would reinforce the importance of developing therapeutic strategies that not only reduce food intake but also increase energy expenditure and brown fat activation,” explains the researcher.

These findings support the broader principle that obesity treatments may be more effective when they target multiple physiological pathways simultaneously. Addressing both energy intake and energy expenditure could offer a more comprehensive approach to weight management and metabolic health.

“This could help improve weight control and reduce associated disorders, such as type 2 diabetes and other metabolic disorders,” she adds.

Towards more personalised prescribing

A deeper understanding of tirzepatide’s mechanisms may also influence how such medicines are prescribed in future.

“Identifying which patient profiles could benefit most, for example those with more compromised energy expenditure, would open the door to more personalized medicine, based not only on appetite or weight control, but also on overall metabolic status,” she emphasizes.

Such an approach could support more tailored treatment strategies for people living with obesity and metabolic disease, taking into account differences in metabolic function rather than focusing solely on body weight.

The need for caution and further research

Despite the promising findings, the researchers emphasise that the results are based on animal data and cannot yet be directly translated into clinical practice.

“As this is a study conducted on mice, we must be cautious, as there may be significant differences between species in terms of metabolism regulation, adipose tissue distribution and response to drugs. Therefore, we need more clinical evidence on the action of these drugs on fat in humans,” concludes Peyrou.

Further human studies will be required to confirm whether the activation of brown adipose tissue observed in mice also occurs in people receiving tirzepatide and whether it meaningfully contributes to its metabolic benefits.

Read More

GPs Offered £3,000 Incentive to Increase Prescribing of NHS Weight Loss Injections

Key Takeaways:

• GP practices in England will be eligible for a £3,000 annual payment for prescribing the maximum number of eligible patients the weight loss drug Mounjaro.
  
• Access to NHS weight loss injections remains tightly restricted, with eligibility based on BMI and specific health conditions.
  
• Professional bodies stress that prescribing decisions are driven by clinical judgement, not financial incentives, and warn that workload pressures may increase.
  
  
  

New financial incentives added to GP contract

GP practices across England are set to receive annual incentive payments of £3,000 for prescribing weight loss medication to the maximum number of patients who meet NHS eligibility criteria.

The payments will be incorporated into the national GP contract from April. In addition, practices will be able to receive approximately £1,000 per year for referring patients to weight loss support programmes.

Ministers have said the objective is to ensure that people who could benefit from structured weight management and pharmacological support are able to access it within primary care.

However, specialists in obesity care have cautioned that the overall impact of the scheme may be modest. They note that eligibility for NHS weight loss injections remains tightly restricted and that the incentive does not expand access to a broader population.

Focus on Mounjaro within primary care

The new incentive applies solely to Mounjaro, a next-generation injectable treatment for weight management.

Mounjaro became available on the NHS in 2025. Despite this, prescribing rates in general practice have reportedly been lower than expected, with some variation in uptake across different areas.

Another injectable weight loss medication, Wegovy, is also available through the NHS. However, it is not prescribed by GPs and is instead provided through specialist NHS weight management services.

More than one million people are estimated to be using weight loss injections in the UK. The majority, around nine in ten, are paying privately rather than receiving the medication through the NHS.

Government position: access based on need

The Health Secretary, Wes Streeting, described the medicines as potentially transformative for people living with obesity.

He said: “Weight loss drugs can be a real game changer for those who need them. I’m determined that access should be based on need, not ability to pay.

“Outside the NHS, we’ve seen those who can spare the cash buying privately, and the proliferation of rogue prescribers peddling dangerous unlicensed drugs that are putting patients at risk.

“Investing in general practice will help bring this modern medicine to the many, not just the few, and help shift the focus of the NHS from treatment to prevention.“

The government argues that embedding prescribing targets within the GP contract is consistent with longstanding practice. Incentive payments have previously been used to improve dementia diagnosis rates, increase vaccination uptake, and encourage the prescription of statins to reduce cardiovascular risk.

This marks the first time that weight loss injections have been formally included in the GP contract framework, with the £3,000 payment linked to prescribing the maximum number of eligible patients Mounjaro.

Strict eligibility criteria remain in place

Although the incentive has been introduced, NHS access to Mounjaro remains limited.

During the current financial year, GPs have only been permitted to prescribe the medication to people with severe obesity defined as a body mass index over 40, alongside certain weight-related health conditions.

From next year, eligibility is expected to expand to include people with a BMI over 35. By 2028, it is anticipated that 220,000 patients will be receiving Mounjaro through the NHS. Lower BMI thresholds apply for some ethnic groups.

Despite these planned expansions, the roll-out to date has been described as uneven, with variation between practices and regions.

Support from obesity advocates – with caveats

Katharine Jenner, Director of the Obesity Health Alliance, welcomed the move but emphasised its limitations.

She said: “This doesn’t mean weight loss drugs will suddenly be available to everyone who wants them.

“NHS access will remain very limited and focused on those with the greatest clinical need, and these treatments are most effective when combined with sustained support.“

She also stressed the importance of prevention alongside treatment:

“If we’re serious about moving from sickness to prevention, expanded treatment must go alongside stronger action to improve the food environment and prevent obesity in the first place.“

Her comments reflect a broader concern within public health that medication alone cannot address the structural drivers of obesity.

Concerns about equity and workload

Dr Katie Bramall, representing the British Medical Association, questioned whether the scheme would meaningfully reduce inequalities in access.

She said: “While the headlines promise much, in reality there will be no change to NHS England’s eligibility criteria for patients to access injectable weight-loss medication on the NHS.

“These proposals will do nothing over the next year to address the divide between those able to pay and those left waiting unable to afford private self-funded treatments“

Similarly, Professor Victoria Tzortziou Brown of the Royal College of GPs emphasised that prescribing decisions are rooted in clinical appropriateness rather than financial drivers.

She said: “GPs do not withhold treatment or prescribe based on financial incentives. Decisions are guided by clinical judgement and what is safest and most appropriate for individual patients.

“Widening the roll-out of these medications in general practice could end up increasing workload in a way that may not be sustainable and risk raising unrealistic expectations among patients who may not be eligible or for whom these medicines are not suitable.“

Supporting GPs to prescribe these medications safely and confidently – from patient selection through initiation, titration and managing side effects – is the focus of professional training such as the College of Contemporary Health’s GLP-1RAs in Practice: Prescribing, a CPD-accredited online short course.

Her comments highlight the tension between expanding pharmacological options in primary care and managing existing workforce pressures.

A cautious step in a tightly controlled rollout

The introduction of incentive payments signals the government’s intention to embed weight loss pharmacotherapy more firmly within general practice. However, strict eligibility criteria remain in place and access is expected to expand gradually over several years.

While the policy aims to increase NHS provision and reduce reliance on private prescribing, professional bodies and advocacy groups have made clear that the immediate effect will be limited. For now, access continues to be targeted at people with the greatest clinical need, with broader prevention strategies still viewed as essential to addressing obesity at population level.

CCH insight:

It is surprising that GPs need incentivising to prescribe GLP-1 medications like Mounjaro – there is undoubtedly a huge need and demand for these drugs. The reluctance to prescribe them is most likely due to the weight bias that still pervades our society and our health system, the view that people shouldn’t need medication to manage their weight. Referring to these drugs as ‘weight loss jabs’ is not helpful – they are anti-obesity medications. Rather than offer a £3k bonus, GPs should be offered training in understanding obesity as a chronic, relapsing disease, and how GLP-1 medications not only support weight loss but can also improve long-term metabolic and cardiovascular health, and in the long run will save billions of pounds by reducing diabetes and heart disease by reducing diabetes and heart disease. That is precisely why targeted education matters more than a bonus: CCH’s GLP-1RAs in Practice: Prescribing CPD short course (2 CPD hours, fully online, CPD-accredited) equips prescribers with everything they need to use these medications well – from patient selection and initiation to titration, side-effect management and the wider conversation about obesity as a chronic disease.

Explore GLP-1RAs in Practice: Prescribing →

Read More

New Cochrane Review Finds Intermittent Fasting Offers No Clear Weight Loss Advantage

Key Takeaways:

• A major Cochrane review found intermittent fasting did not lead to clinically meaningful weight loss compared with standard dietary advice or no structured diet.
  
• Evidence on safety and long-term outcomes remains limited due to small trials, inconsistent reporting, and short follow-up periods.
  
• Experts caution against overinterpreting social media claims and emphasise the need for individualised, long-term approaches to weight management.
  
  
  

Intermittent fasting under scrutiny

Intermittent fasting has become one of the most widely promoted dietary strategies for weight loss, often presented as a superior alternative to conventional calorie reduction. However, a new Cochrane review suggests that these claims may not be supported by robust evidence.

According to the review, intermittent fasting does not appear to deliver greater weight loss than standard dietary advice or even no specific diet plan. The findings challenge the widespread perception that structured fasting schedules offer a unique or clinically meaningful advantage for people who are overweight or living with obesity.

Obesity remains a global public health challenge

Obesity continues to represent a major public health concern worldwide and is now among the leading causes of death in high-income countries. Data from the World Health Organization show that global adult obesity rates have more than tripled since 1975. By 2022, an estimated 2.5 billion adults were classified as overweight, including around 890 million adults living with obesity.

Against this backdrop, intermittent fasting has gained substantial attention. Eating patterns such as alternate-day fasting, periodic fasting, and time-restricted feeding are widely promoted across social media platforms, often accompanied by claims of rapid weight loss and metabolic benefits.

What the review examined

To assess whether intermittent fasting truly offers an advantage, researchers analysed 22 randomised clinical trials involving 1,995 adults across North America, Europe, China, Australia, and South America. The studies evaluated a range of fasting approaches, including alternate-day fasting, periodic fasting, and time-restricted feeding. Most trials followed participants for up to one year.

When outcomes were compared with those of traditional dietary advice or no dietary intervention, intermittent fasting did not result in a clinically meaningful difference in weight loss. In practical terms, fasting-based approaches did not outperform more conventional strategies.

Limited evidence on safety and long-term outcomes

The review also highlighted substantial limitations in the available evidence. Reporting of side effects varied widely between studies, and many trials were relatively small. Inconsistent data collection made it difficult to draw firm conclusions about safety or potential long-term effects.

As a result, the overall certainty of the evidence was judged to be limited.

“Intermittent fasting just doesn’t seem to work for overweight or obese adults trying to lose weight,” said Luis Garegnani, lead author of the review from the Universidad Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires Cochrane Associate Centre.

Social media enthusiasm outpaces the evidence

Garegnani also warned against the level of enthusiasm surrounding intermittent fasting online. “Intermittent fasting may be a reasonable option for some people, but the current evidence doesn’t justify the enthusiasm we see on social media.”

A further concern is the lack of long-term research. Few studies have examined outcomes beyond relatively short trial periods. “Obesity is a chronic condition. Short-term trials make it difficult to guide long-term decision-making for patients and clinicians,” Garegnani added.

Generalisability remains uncertain

Most of the studies included in the review primarily involved white participants living in high-income countries. Given that obesity prevalence is rising rapidly in low and middle-income countries, the findings may not fully reflect outcomes in more diverse global populations.

The authors note that responses to intermittent fasting could vary depending on sex, age, ethnic background, underlying health conditions, or existing eating behaviours and eating disorders.

Implications for clinical practice

Given the current state of evidence, the review’s authors advise caution when recommending intermittent fasting as a weight loss strategy.

“With the current evidence available, it’s hard to make a general recommendation,” said Eva Madrid, senior author from the Cochrane Evidence Synthesis Unit Iberoamerica. “Doctors will need to take a case-by-case approach when advising an overweight adult on losing weight.”

Overall, the findings reinforce the need for personalised, sustainable approaches to weight management rather than reliance on highly promoted dietary trends.

Read More

Nutrition Gaps Raise Safety Concerns as Use of GLP-1 Weight Loss Drugs Accelerates

Key Takeaways:

• Many people prescribed GLP-1 weight loss medications receive little or no structured nutritional guidance, increasing the risk of preventable vitamin and mineral deficiencies and loss of muscle mass.
  
• New research highlights a lack of high-quality evidence on how diet quality, protein intake, and micronutrient intake are affected during treatment with drugs such as semaglutide and tirzepatide.
  
• Experts warn that without integrated nutritional care, the rapid expansion of GLP-1 drug use could undermine long-term health benefits despite effective weight loss.
  
  
  

Experts from University College London and the University of Cambridge are warning that many people prescribed newer weight loss medications may not be receiving sufficient nutritional guidance to support safe and sustainable weight loss. As a result, some individuals may face avoidable risks, including vitamin and mineral deficiencies and loss of lean body mass, particularly muscle.

The concerns arise from new research published in Obesity Reviews. Led by Dr Marie Spreckley of the University of Cambridge, the review identified limited high-quality evidence on how nutritional advice influences calorie intake, body composition, protein consumption, and patient experiences among people using these medications.

How GLP-1 weight loss drugs work

Drugs such as semaglutide and tirzepatide, sold under brand names including Ozempic, Wegovy, and Mounjaro, work by mimicking the action of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). This hormone is released after eating and plays a role in regulating appetite and glucose metabolism. By enhancing feelings of fullness, reducing hunger, and dampening food cravings, these medications can substantially lower energy intake.

Studies suggest that calorie intake may fall by 16–39%, helping to explain why these drugs are highly effective for people living with obesity or overweight. However, the researchers note that there has been very little detailed study of how such reductions affect overall diet quality, protein intake, or micronutrient intake, including vitamins and minerals. Existing evidence indicates that lean body mass, including muscle tissue, can account for as much as 40% of total weight lost during treatment.

Experts warn of risks without nutrition support

Dr Adrian Brown, an NIHR Advanced Fellow at UCL’s Centre of Obesity Research and the study’s corresponding author, described how these medications alter eating behaviour.

“Obesity management medications work by suppressing appetite, increasing feelings of fullness, and altering eating behaviors, which often leads people to eat significantly less. This can be highly beneficial for individuals living with obesity, as it supports substantial weight loss and improves health outcomes.

“However, without appropriate nutritional guidance and support from healthcare professionals, there is a real risk that reduced food intake could compromise dietary quality, meaning people may not get enough protein, fiber, vitamins, and minerals essential for maintaining overall health.”

Without structured support, reduced intake may unintentionally lead to inadequate consumption of nutrients needed to preserve muscle mass, bone health, immune function, and overall physical resilience.

Public guidelines versus private use

Guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommends semaglutide for weight management only for people who meet strict eligibility criteria, such as a body mass index of at least 35.0 kg/m² alongside obesity-related comorbidities including type 2 diabetes or cardiovascular disease. When prescribed through the NHS, the medication is intended to be delivered as part of a comprehensive programme that includes dietary changes and increased physical activity.

In reality, most people currently using GLP-1 drugs in the UK obtain them outside the NHS. An estimated 1.5 million people are now using these medications, with around 95% accessing them through private providers. In these settings, ongoing nutritional advice and follow-up support are not always consistently offered.

Rising use outpaces nutrition guidance

Dr Spreckley, who works at the Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit at the University of Cambridge, said nutritional care has not kept pace with the rapid uptake of these therapies.

“Use of GLP-1 receptor agonist therapies has increased rapidly in a very short period of time, but the nutritional support available to people using these medications has not kept pace. Many people receive little or no structured guidance on diet quality, protein intake, or micronutrient adequacy while experiencing marked appetite suppression.

“If nutritional care is not integrated alongside treatment, there’s a risk of replacing one set of health problems with another, through preventable nutritional deficiencies and largely avoidable loss of muscle mass. This represents a missed opportunity to support long-term health alongside weight loss.”

Low intakes of essential vitamins and minerals are associated with fatigue, impaired immune function, hair loss, and increased risk of osteoporosis. Loss of lean mass, most commonly muscle, can also raise the likelihood of weakness, injuries, and falls, particularly in older adults.

Limited research leaves major questions unanswered

The review identified only 12 studies that examined diet and nutritional outcomes alongside treatment with semaglutide or tirzepatide. These studies differed widely in how dietary advice was delivered and how nutritional outcomes were measured. Many lacked standardised methods and consistent reporting, making it difficult to draw firm conclusions about best practice.

Despite the rapid expansion of GLP-1 drug use, the researchers found little robust evidence to guide clinicians on how to support people nutritionally during treatment.

Lessons from bariatric nutrition care

Given the urgent need for practical guidance, the researchers suggest that interim lessons could be drawn from nutritional care used after bariatric surgery. Procedures such as gastric banding and gastric bypass lead to similar reductions in appetite and food intake.

Dr Cara Ruggiero, a co-author from the MRC Epidemiology Unit at the University of Cambridge, said established post-surgery principles could help address current gaps.

“While GLP-1 receptor agonists are increasingly used, there remains a clear gap in structured nutritional guidance. In the interim, we can draw on well-established post-bariatric nutrition principles. Our previous work highlights the importance of prioritizing nutrient-dense foods including high-quality protein intake, ideally distributed evenly across meals, to help preserve lean mass during periods of reduced appetite and rapid weight loss.”

Equipping healthcare professionals with the nutritional knowledge to guide patients safely through this kind of rapid weight loss is the focus of professional training such as the College of Contemporary Health’s Nutrition & Weight Management Essentials, a CPD-accredited online short course.

The available evidence did not support recommending strict low-fat diets alongside GLP-1 therapies. However, some observational studies reported that people using these medications consumed relatively high amounts of total and saturated fat, suggesting a potential need for personalised guidance that aligns with national dietary recommendations.

Meal timing was rarely examined in clinical trials. Nevertheless, the researchers note that eating smaller meals more frequently may help manage side effects such as nausea and improve tolerability, particularly during the early stages of treatment.

Studying real-world experiences

The research team also emphasised the importance of incorporating the perspectives of people using GLP-1 medications into future studies. Understanding what types of information and support individuals find most helpful could improve real-world care and long-term outcomes.

To address this, the team has launched AMPLIFY – Amplifying Meaningful Perspectives and Lived experiences of Incretin therapy use From diverse communitY voices. The project aims to explore how people experience next-generation weight loss medications in everyday life.

“These medications are transforming obesity care, but we know very little about how they shape people’s daily lives, including changes in appetite, eating patterns, well-being, and quality of life,” Dr Spreckley said. “That’s what we’ll explore, working in particular with people from communities historically under-represented in obesity research, to help shape the future of obesity treatment.”

The research was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research, with additional support from the Medical Research Council and the NIHR UCLH Biomedical Research Centre.

CCH insights:

GLP-1 medications are licensed for the treatment of diabetes and obesity and they should be used alongside diet and lifestyle advice to improve cardiometabolic health. However, they are now commonly known as ‘weight loss drugs’, implying their primary aim is for people to lose weight. But this is kind of missing the point – the weight loss outcome is one of the mediating effects of the drugs which leads to improved health. However, if weight loss is not accompanied by a move to a healthy diet, which provides adequate levels of essential nutrients, then health outcomes will be compromised, as highlighted by this study then health outcomes will be compromised, as highlighted by this study. Closing that gap starts with clinicians themselves being confident in the fundamentals: CCH’s Nutrition & Weight Management Essentials CPD short course (10 CPD hours, fully online, CPD-accredited) gives healthcare professionals a solid grounding in nutrition and weight management, including how to help patients meet their protein and micronutrient needs and preserve lean muscle during weight loss.

Explore Nutrition & Weight Management Essentials →

Read More

More Than One in Four Adults Worldwide May Be Eligible for GLP-1 Weight-Loss Medicines, Global Analysis Suggests

Key Takeaways: 

• More than 27 percent of adults globally may be eligible for GLP-1 receptor agonists for weight management, based on pooled data from 99 countries.
  
• Eligibility is highest among women, older adults, and people living in low- and middle-income countries, raising significant questions around access and health equity.
  
• Researchers emphasise that medicines alone are not sufficient, and sustained investment in prevention and non-pharmacological obesity care remains essential.
  
  
  

A growing global obesity challenge

The worldwide prevalence of obesity has more than doubled over the past three decades, accompanied by sharp rises in weight-related conditions such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and several cancers. This escalating public health challenge places increasing strain on healthcare systems and national economies across the globe.

Against this backdrop, a new international study suggests that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, commonly referred to as GLP-1 medications, could play a substantial role in addressing obesity and its related complications at scale. The analysis was co-led by investigators from Mass General Brigham and aimed to estimate how many adults worldwide might benefit from these medicines.

Large-scale global data analysis

Researchers from Mass General Brigham collaborated with colleagues at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis and Emory University’s Rollins School of Public Health to pool household health survey data from 99 countries, collected between 2008 and 2021.

The final dataset included 810,635 adults aged 25 to 64 years, selected based on the availability of key clinical measures, including:

• Body mass index
• Blood pressure
• Diabetes biomarkers
• Diagnostic history of hypertension and diabetes
  

Eligibility for GLP-1 treatment was defined using established clinical thresholds. Adults were considered eligible if they had:

• A BMI greater than 30, or
• A BMI greater than 27 in the presence of hypertension, diabetes, or both
  
  
  

One in four adults eligible worldwide

Using these criteria, the researchers found that 27 percent of adults globally would be eligible for GLP-1 medications for weight management. Notably, around four-fifths of eligible individuals lived in low- and middle-income countries, highlighting a potential mismatch between need and access.

Eligibility varied substantially by region:

• Europe and North America showed the highest rates at 42.8 percent
• The Pacific Islands followed closely at 41.0 percent
  

Differences were also observed across demographic groups:

• Women were more likely to be eligible than men, at 28.5 percent versus lower rates among men
• Older adults showed markedly higher eligibility at 38.3 percent, compared with 17.9 percent among younger adults
  

The findings were published as a research letter in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology.

Rethinking obesity through biology

Commenting on the findings, co-senior author Jennifer Manne-Goehler, MD, ScD, a physician at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Mass General Brigham, highlighted the paradigm shift represented by GLP-1 therapies.

“There has never been such a potentially transformational and scalable tool for obesity, type 2 diabetes, and other health-related complications of obesity.”

She also reflected on the historical framing of obesity as a personal failing rather than a biologically driven disease.

“For so many decades, we told everyone the problem was you – you need to move more and eat less, then you will not struggle with this problem. GLP-1 receptor agonists have allowed us to really understand that biology is much more powerful than that, and ‘eat less, move more’ is just an oversimplified way to think about things.”

Global interest meets practical constraints

The potential of GLP-1 medicines has already been recognised by the World Health Organization, which is actively exploring ways to make these treatments more widely available as standard therapies. However, translating this promise into real-world impact depends on understanding the scale of need and addressing significant barriers to access.

Corresponding author Sang Gune K. Yoo, MD, who conducted the work while a research fellow in cardiology at Washington University School of Medicine, noted that the findings were consistent with global obesity trends.

“Given the steadily increasing prevalence of obesity, it is not surprising that our analysis found that more than one quarter of adults around the world may be eligible for this medication.”

He cautioned, however, that important questions remain unanswered.

“This medication has the potential to help many individuals, although further research is needed to better understand its long-term safety and sustainability. Access remains a major challenge as these medications are difficult to obtain in many settings. Most importantly, we must continue to invest in and develop effective non-pharmacological strategies for the prevention and treatment of obesity, an area where substantial gaps remain.”

Equity at the centre of global implementation

The study also underscores profound equity considerations. Eligibility was disproportionately high among women and people living in regions with limited healthcare resources.

Manne-Goehler highlighted the urgency of addressing these disparities.

“These socioeconomic and gender eligibility percentiles are especially staggering. As of last year, type 2 diabetes was the top cause of death for women in South Africa. There are parts of the world where women can really benefit from these medicines, and it is our job to see through their implementation.”

Co-lead author Felix Teufel, MD, from Emory University’s Rollins School of Public Health, framed access to GLP-1 therapies as a broader ethical issue.

“Global access to GLP-1s is a question of health equity. The goal is to ensure large-scale access for people who would benefit most – not just those easiest to reach.”

Beyond medicines alone

While the findings point to a potentially transformative role for GLP-1 medications in global obesity care, the authors stress that pharmacological approaches cannot replace comprehensive prevention and treatment strategies. Addressing obesity at scale will continue to require sustained investment in public health, supportive environments, and evidence-based, non-pharmacological interventions alongside new medical therapies.

CCH insight:

This study reminds us of the scale of the obesity pandemic. There are more than 1 billion people estimated to be living with obesity, according to the World Health Organisation – most of whom could in theory benefit from GLP-1 medications. The priority should be to provide access for those who are in greatest need, rather than those who can afford to pay for them. The development of oral GLP-1s is a big step, as this will increase access and bring prices down, but there is a very long way to go.

Read More

Wegovy Oral Obesity Treatment Launches in US Pharmacies Following FDA Approval

Key Takeaways: 

• The oral form of Wegovy has launched in pharmacies, with the starting dose available now and higher doses expected shortly.
  
• Clinical trial data show weight loss outcomes comparable to the injectable version when taken as prescribed alongside dietary and activity changes.
  
• Pricing varies significantly depending on dose and insurance coverage, with list prices matching the injectable formulation.
  
  
  

Oral Wegovy becomes available nationwide

The oral form of Wegovy launched on Monday, with the starting dose now available in pharmacies across the country. Higher doses are expected to arrive by the end of the week, according to reports accompanying the launch.

The pill was approved by the Food and Drug Administration on 22 December for the treatment of obesity. It is also approved to reduce the risk of heart attack and stroke in people who are living with obesity or who are overweight.

Building on the success of the injectable formulation

The launch of the pill follows the blockbuster success of Novo Nordisk’s injectable Wegovy, which has been available since 2021. Demand for the injection was so high that it remained in short supply until February 2025.

Novo Nordisk has positioned the oral formulation as an alternative for people who prefer not to use injections, while maintaining similar clinical effectiveness.

Evidence from clinical trials

Clinical trial data suggest that the oral version of Wegovy delivers weight loss results comparable to the injectable form. In a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, participants taking a 25 milligram Wegovy pill experienced an average weight reduction of 13.6% over 64 weeks. By comparison, participants receiving a placebo lost an average of 2.2% of their body weight.

Novo Nordisk estimates that people who remain on treatment, reduce their calorie intake and engage in regular physical activity could achieve an average weight reduction of 16.6%.

How the pill is taken and side effects

Unlike the injectable formulation, the Wegovy pill must be taken on an empty stomach. People are advised to wait at least 30 minutes before eating or drinking anything else to ensure the medicine is properly absorbed.

The most commonly reported side effects are similar to those seen with the injection and include nausea, diarrhoea and vomiting.

Pricing and insurance coverage

When Novo Nordisk announced a drug pricing agreement with the Trump administration in November, the company stated that it would offer the obesity pill for $149 per month to people not using health insurance. This price applies only to the starting dose purchased directly by consumers. Higher doses will be priced at $299 per month under the same arrangement.

The list price, which is used to determine insurance coverage, is set at $1,349 per month. This matches the list price of the injectable Wegovy.

Insurance coverage for obesity medications became more restrictive in 2025, according to an analysis from GoodRx, a website that helps people find discounts on prescription medicines. Novo Nordisk has said that people with insurance coverage may be able to access the Wegovy pill for as little as $25 per month.

How Wegovy compares with other oral GLP-1 medicines

Although the Wegovy pill is the first oral obesity treatment of its kind to receive FDA approval, Novo Nordisk already markets an oral GLP-1 medicine for Type 2 diabetes called Rybelsus. Rybelsus contains the same active ingredient, semaglutide, but is prescribed at different doses and is not approved for obesity.

Competition in the oral obesity drug market may soon increase. Eli Lilly, the manufacturer of the Zepbound injection, applied to the FDA in late 2025 for approval of its own obesity pill. The agency granted the company a priority review voucher, with a regulatory decision expected as early as this year.

CCH insight:

Hopefully oral Wegovy will be available in the UK soon, and at a more affordable cost than the injectable version. And this will hopefully enable increased access to the drug on the NHS. The current, very limited availability of GLP-1 therapy on the NHS is costing the UK tax-payer, because the cost of treating the complications and consequences of obesity is much greater than the cost of treating obesity – GLP-1s not only lead to weight loss, they reduce the risk of diabetes, heart disease, kidney disease and possibly many other conditions.

Read More

Internalised Weight Stigma Places Heavy Emotional Burden on People Seeking Bariatric Care, Indian Study Finds

Key Takeaways:

• More than 71 percent of participants preparing for metabolic and bariatric surgery reported high levels of internalised weight bias, with many expressing self-blame, shame, and reduced self-worth.
  
• Younger individuals and those with a higher BMI reported stronger internalised stigma, which affected emotional well-being, social relationships, and readiness to seek treatment.
  
• Researchers and clinicians stress that obesity is a chronic disease, not a personal failing, and warn that stigma significantly harms mental health and delays access to appropriate care.
  
  

Introduction

A new study has highlighted the profound emotional and psychological toll experienced by people living with obesity who are preparing for metabolic and bariatric surgery. The research found that internalised weight bias is widespread among individuals seeking specialist care, with many reporting depressive symptoms, reduced self-esteem, and deep feelings of self-criticism linked to their weight.

The pilot study, titled The Burden from Within—An Indian Pilot Study on Weight Bias Internalisation, was published in Obesity Surgery, the international journal of the International Federation for the Surgery and Other Therapies for Obesity (IFSO).

Weight stigma beginning in childhood and persisting into adulthood

Lead author Dr Aparna Govil Bhasker, a Mumbai-based bariatric surgeon at the MetaHeal Laparoscopy and Bariatric Surgery Centre, told The Indian Express that stigmatising experiences often begin early in life. She explained that weight-related bullying is common during childhood and continues into adulthood for many people.

“People living with obesity are frequently judged as lazy or lacking willpower. Negative media portrayals, especially weight-based memes and stigmatising content, only deepen these harmful beliefs. Post-pandemic trends show that online negativity toward obesity has grown even stronger,” she said.

Study design and participant profile

To assess the emotional impact of obesity on people seeking surgical intervention, the research team evaluated 142 participants using the validated Weight Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS). Of the total cohort, 78.9 percent were women, and all participants had a body mass index of at least 27.5 kg/m².

Researchers examined total WBIS scores, associations with age, and correlations with BMI to understand how internalised stigma manifests in individuals preparing for metabolic and bariatric surgery.

High prevalence of internalised weight bias

The study revealed striking levels of internalised stigma:

• More than 71.1 percent of participants scored above the neutral benchmark on the WBIS, indicating widespread internalisation of negative weight-based beliefs.
  
• Around 74.6 percent reported feeling depressed about their weight.
  
• More than half felt less attractive because of their weight.
  
• More than one-third questioned their own competence.

The findings indicate that weight stigma does not simply come from external sources. Many participants had come to believe the negative stereotypes directed at them.

Self-judgement, self-hate, and social avoidance

The report found that more than half of the individuals surveyed expressed intense self-criticism, including feelings of self-hatred related to their weight. Many participants described weight as a defining measure of their personal worth.

Social relationships were also severely affected. Approximately 45.8 percent of participants questioned why anyone they considered attractive would want to date them. Half believed they did not deserve a fulfilling social life until they lost weight.

The data also showed that younger participants experienced stronger internalised bias, while those with higher BMI levels demonstrated deeper self-directed stigma.

“This shows that obesity status and internalisation of weight bias affect social interactions, connections, and relationships, which can have a long-lasting impact on the life course of an individual’s personal, emotional, occupational, and financial trajectory,” Dr Govil Bhasker said.

Obesity rising rapidly in India but not recognised as a disease

The researchers noted that obesity rates in India have nearly doubled since 2005. Data from the fifth National Family Health Survey (2019–21) show that 24 percent of women and 22.9 percent of men aged 15 to 49 years live with overweight or obesity.

Despite this rapid rise, obesity is not officially classified as a disease in India. Dr Govil Bhasker argued that the findings underline the deep societal stigma embedded in attitudes toward obesity.

“Patients often feel ashamed, guilty, and discouraged. They endure years of negative comments, judgment, and misinformation, and over time, these negative experiences become internalized. This affects their self-worth and mental health and can delay their decision to seek proper treatment. Obesity is a chronic disease, not a personal failure, and supporting patients emotionally is just as important as helping them medically,” she said. She added that targeted interventions are urgently needed.

Stigma’s broad impact on mental and physical health

Dr Vishakha Jain, Professor of Medicine at AIIMS BibiNagar and one of the study’s co-authors, emphasised that stigma infiltrates every aspect of daily life.

She explained that persistent stigma affects physical health, mental well-being, occupational performance, and social relationships. It can contribute to unhealthy eating patterns and biological stress responses, including increased inflammation.

“Together, these pressures create a cycle of self-blame and prejudice, often making individuals feel undeserving of care,” Dr Jain said.

Conclusion

The study provides compelling evidence that internalised weight stigma is highly prevalent among people preparing for bariatric care in India and that it carries profound psychological, social, and behavioural consequences. The authors urge greater recognition of obesity as a chronic disease and call for emotional as well as medical support for individuals affected.

Read More

WHO Warns of Severe Global Shortages of GLP-1 Obesity Medicines as Demand Surges

Key Takeaways: 

• Fewer than one in ten people worldwide who could benefit from GLP-1 medicines such as Wegovy and Mounjaro are currently able to access them, due to major limitations in production, affordability, and health system readiness.
  
• The World Health Organization has issued its first formal guidance on the clinical use of GLP-1 therapies, describing them as “a new chapter” in the treatment of obesity, but emphasising the need for equitable access and comprehensive lifestyle support.
  
• Without urgent action, global obesity prevalence is projected to double to two billion people by 2030, with associated economic costs reaching three trillion US dollars.
  
  

WHO Issues first guidance on GLP-1 medicines amid severe supply constraints

The World Health Organization has warned that fewer than one in ten people globally who could benefit from modern GLP-1 obesity medicines are currently able to obtain them, despite the scale of the obesity epidemic and the transformative clinical potential of drugs such as Wegovy and Mounjaro.

With more than one billion people worldwide now living with obesity, the WHO has called for far more widespread, affordable, and equitable access to GLP-1 therapies. Projections indicate that more than two billion people will be living with obesity by 2030 unless governments implement decisive action. The economic burden is expected to rise steeply, with global costs anticipated to reach three trillion US dollars by the same date.

Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General, stressed that modern pharmacological treatments must be understood as part of a long-term care approach. He stated: “Our new guidance recognises that obesity is a chronic disease that can be treated with comprehensive and lifelong care. While medication alone will not solve this global health crisis, GLP-1 therapies can help millions overcome obesity and reduce its associated harms.”

The WHO has already added GLP-1 medicines to its essential medicines list for people who are overweight and living with diabetes, signalling that countries are advised to provide access to them. The organisation’s new guidance, described as a “special communication” aimed at clinicians, sets out for the first time its formal position on the value, limitations, and safe use of these drugs.

A new chapter in obesity treatment

The WHO notes that GLP-1 therapies represent “more than a scientific breakthrough”. They mark a decisive shift in how obesity is conceptualised, moving away from viewing it solely as a “lifestyle condition” and towards recognising it as a complex, preventable, and treatable chronic disease. The statement published in the Journal of the American Medical Association asserted: “GLP-1 therapies … have emerged as an important innovation in addressing the global obesity challenge. The advent of these medications represents a tipping point in the treatment of obesity, its complications and related co-morbidities.”

The WHO highlighted increasing evidence that GLP-1 therapies may also reduce the risk of several serious conditions, including heart attacks, strokes, type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, elevated cholesterol, sleep apnoea, and kidney and arterial disease.

However, the organisation emphasised that these medicines must always be paired with holistic support. Individuals prescribed GLP-1s should receive advice on nutrition, physical activity, and behavioural counselling to maintain weight loss and improve long-term health outcomes. The WHO also reiterated that pregnant women should not use GLP-1 therapies.

Global access limited by production, affordability, and system capacity

Despite rising demand, global production capacity remains a major barrier. The WHO estimates that even under the most optimistic forecasts, manufacturers could produce enough GLP-1 medicines for only about 100 million people. This represents less than 10 per cent of the more than one billion who could benefit.

High prices, limited manufacturing capability, and supply chain constraints all significantly restrict access. The WHO has urged pharmaceutical companies to expand production rapidly and to reduce the prices of medications such as Mounjaro and Ozempic to prevent people in low-income countries from being excluded.

The guideline calls for measures such as voluntary licensing, through which patent-holding companies allow other manufacturers to produce low-cost generic versions. This pathway may soon become more viable as key patents expire. The patent on semaglutide, the active ingredient in Novo Nordisk’s Wegovy, is due to expire in several countries in 2026. Once this occurs, manufacturers in India, Canada, China, Brazil, Turkey, and other jurisdictions will be able to develop and sell more affordable versions.

The WHO also underscored three persistent barriers that must be addressed to achieve global access:

1. Limited production capacity, availability, and affordability.
   
2. Health system readiness to prescribe and monitor the medicines.
   
3. Universal access to healthcare services.
   

Dr Tedros stressed the organisation’s “greatest concern is equitable access”.

Calls for national action on prevention and supportive environments

While pharmacotherapy can assist individuals living with obesity, the WHO stated that countries must continue to prioritise prevention and create healthier environments. This includes promoting physical activity, improving food systems, and ensuring that population-level interventions accompany advances in medical treatment.

How GLP-1 obesity medicines work

GLP-1 medicines work by mimicking a natural hormone that slows digestion, suppresses appetite, and increases feelings of fullness. This results in people eating less and typically losing weight within a few weeks of starting treatment.

In the United Kingdom, GLP-1 medicines are prescription-only and can only be supplied following clinical assessment by a healthcare professional. Some formulations are available through the NHS, although many are obtained privately. A black market for these medicines exists, and the WHO and UK regulators warn that people should avoid unregulated sources such as beauty salons or social media sellers.

Research suggests that people often regain much of the weight within a year after stopping GLP-1 therapy, as physiological hunger cues return. This further reinforces the need for comprehensive, long-term behavioural support.

Global obesity burden and associated risks

Obesity affects people in every country and was associated with 3.7 million deaths worldwide in 2024, according to the WHO. Being overweight or living with obesity increases the risk of numerous serious health conditions, including type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, stroke, and several cancers. The WHO’s statement highlights the immense public health implications if access to effective interventions continues to lag far behind global need.

Expert commentary

The WHO statement was authored by senior clinicians Francesca Celletti, Luz De Regil, and Jeremy Farrar, the organisation’s Assistant Director for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention and Control. Dr Farrar formerly served as WHO Chief Scientist and Director of the Wellcome Trust in London.

Katherine Jenner, Executive Director of the United Kingdom’s Obesity Health Alliance, emphasised that medicines are only part of the solution. She stated: “Weight loss drugs have an important role to play, but they are not a silver bullet. In the United Kingdom right now, access is still limited, supply is fragile, and NHS use is tightly targeted. These powerful medicines can help individuals with chronic obesity, but they are not suitable for everyone and must be accompanied by comprehensive support to be used safely and effectively. Evidence shows that most people regain weight once they stop taking these drugs, and we cannot medicate two-thirds of the population indefinitely.”

CCH insight:

The limited supply of GLP-1 medicines globally is of course frustrating, but until new drugs come to market, and just liraglutide, semaglutide and tirzepatide available, this is likely to continue. All three of these drugs are polypeptides, delivered via injection ‘pens’ and must be refrigerated, so they are expensive and complicated to produce. However, new GLP-1 medications are in development which should improve access and reduce costs, such as orforglipron – a small molecule which is easier to produce and can be taken orally in pill form.

Read More